None of These Things Move Me!

From XFamily - Children of God

None of These Things Move Me!

— By Maria and Peter, CM/FM#3307, July 2000

Dear Family,

1. God bless you, dear ones! We love you and appreciate your continued faith and loyalty! We’re so proud of you and admire how you stand up for the truth in the face of adversity! 2. You should have received “Stay on the Wall” by now (ML #3303, GN 902), which we pray was a help to you. Recently, attacks on our faith, ranging from distortions of the truth to outright lies, have multiplied; they’ve spread quite far and wide in some areas through e-mail, Web sites, and word of mouth. 3. We’ve received letters from some of you who have become discouraged, depressed or confused by the writings of some former members who are bent on attacking, belittling and weakening your faith. The Lord is allowing this, because we know that nothing happens without His express permission. Most of our former members remain favorable, God bless them. We’re very sorry for those few who have taken a stand against us, as we wish they could find their satisfaction and fulfillment in helping people and furthering the cause of Christ, rather than investing their time in criticizing or trying to fight and stop those who are. Of course, they don’t admit to the fact that that’s what they’re trying to do. They cloak their true intentions by saying they’re venting their frustrations, sharing their views, or giving personal explanations for their own actions, but their goal is to undermine and destroy, if possible, your faith. 4. Not only do they want to cause you to distrust and even hate me and Peter and the Family’s doctrines, but they ultimately want you to leave the Family. In circulating all the woeful, doubtful details of why they left the Family as widely as possible, they’re hoping many others will join them. They’ve sent these to Charter Members and Fellow Members alike, and even to other former members, but their target is particularly you young people and those who are new to the Family. That ought to really piss you off! Excuse the language--and I don’t recommend it for everyday use--but this makes me fighting mad, and it should do the same for you! 5. It’s pitiful that those who were once close can turn so vehemently against us. Peter and I don’t hold any personal grudges against those who disagree with us, and we’re not personally up in arms about what’s being said about us as individuals, because we know that the same type of things were said of Jesus, His disciples, and of Dad, so we count ourselves in good company. We know you can’t please everybody all the time, and as Dad taught us, there’s often a pattern when people leave the Family, especially if they have become bitter. So we’re not surprised at the antagonism. But what we don’t like and won’t take lying down is when people deliberately try to divide, weaken and hurt you, our flock, by an outright, calculated attack on your faith in the Word. In ridiculing the Word, they’re ridiculing God and you and your beliefs, and we won’t stand by while they do that. 6. As Peter and I mentioned in “Stay on the Wall,” we don’t have time nor has the Lord shown us to get into a tit-for-tat reply to every accusation that has been leveled against us, Dad, the Word, WS, or the Family. That’s futile, because as soon as we’d answer today’s accusations, misinterpretations or lies, our accusers would concoct another batch tomorrow. However, in this GN we will try to provide you with some general answers and explanations, which we pray will help to settle questions that you may have in relation to all of this, and strengthen your faith. 7. Hearing accounts from those who were once with us but who have chosen another road can often cause confusion, especially when they claim to have the inside scoop or information that you don’t know about. The problem is that these disgruntled folks have personal agendas, even though they may claim not to, and so they paint a very distorted picture. They claim their testimonies are the truth, when in fact they’re distortions and embellishments of the truth, with facts and details left out when they don’t support their slanted view of things. They misrepresent the truth in a way that causes the reader to believe many things that are untrue--and all for a reason: to make you doubt, disbelieve, and then leave the Lord’s service. We hope that our replies will help to answer the questions that you may have on these topics.

Reading Anti-Family Material 8. We strongly suggested in “Stay on the Wall” that you not dignify these former members’ anti-Family diatribes with your attention, as doing so will only distract you and take a toll on you spiritually. As soon as we published “Stay on the Wall” and outspoken former members got ahold of it, they cried, “censorship, control, manipulation,” etc., claiming that we are a cult because Peter and I are trying to keep you from reading “outside information” and “contrary opinions.” We expected that those who are against the Family would come out with this very response to our strong suggestion that you don’t take in the lies and perversions of the truth that are in these anti-Family letters and Web site postings that are designed to weaken your faith and destroy your life and service for the Lord. 9. Peter and I don’t demand that you not read this material. We’re just letting you know that it’s not choosing the good and eschewing the evil. It’s not going to make you happy, nor is it going to strengthen you spiritually. It will very likely confuse you--and we know where that comes from, since God is not the author of confusion but of peace. 10. There’s a lot of garbage in there that we’d like to protect you from for your own peace of mind, and this is our commission as shepherds of the Lord’s sheep. But we’re not forcing you not to read it; we’re just warning you that you’ll find it very depressing and full of doubts and deceptions. If you really want to read it, I know there’s nothing I can do or say that will stop you. 11. Peter and I aren’t trying to keep you under our control, and you know as well as we do that we couldn’t even if we wanted to! We have no way of monitoring all your communications or contacts; nor do we want to. We respect people’s personal choices and desires. We do, however, want to help you as much as possible to stay spiritually strong and busy doing the important job the Lord has given us of preaching the Gospel and reaching the world with His message. 12. We’re not trying to hide anything from you; our counsel to not read such negative material from those who are no longer with us is because it will cause you spiritual problems. Yes, it holds some truth, but it’s only one person’s viewpoint with his or her spin on it and their interpretation of past events. It’s not the full truth, it brings up things from the past that we’ve already answered and resolved, and it contains outright lies. 13. I believe that those of you who received such letters and chose not to read them can testify that you did this because you believed in your heart that it was the right thing to do--the best thing for you, not just the best thing for Peter and me! You sensed and believed that it was only going to drag down your spirit and you didn’t want to put yourself through that. Good for you! Some might say that’s weakness, but to protect your spirit, mind and channel by not submitting yourself to someone’s tirade against the Family is showing spiritual strength, conviction, and wisdom. 14. Why go through the ordeal of reading all about someone’s bitterness, resentment and spite? In a way, it’s a bit like reading a tabloid magazine. People who read those often don’t believe half of what they read, but still, it gets them into a gossipy and critical mindset. Of course, reading something that’s attempting to tear down your faith is more dangerous spiritually than reading gossip that doesn’t relate to you, and you have to go to all the trouble of analyzing it, separating the truths from the lies, and the half-truths from the quarter-truths. Unfortunately, however, sometimes you can’t accurately discern between the truth and the lies, as such writings often try to portray themselves as some kind of “inside scoop” on events or details that you’re not familiar enough with to judge. So the writer’s hope is that you’ll just naively believe it, thinking, “Well, it must be true! Why else would they be saying it?” 15. The Lord has admonished us in the Word that “whatsoever things are true, honest, just, pure, lovely, and of good report, think on these things” (Phil.4:8). And “keep thy heart with all diligence, for out of it are the issues of life” (Pro.4:23). Yes, there are negative things in each of us and in life as a whole, but we’re not to dwell on them but rather on the Lord. If we let our focus get off balance to where we concentrate on the negative, then it’s going to distort our perception of the way things really are. 16. The Word also says to “prove all things; hold fast that which is good” (1Thes. 5:21). You might say that you should then prove for yourself whether there is “good” or worthy material in these letters and Web postings. Well, you could. But since Peter and I and others have gone through them already, we can save you the trouble and tell you that there isn’t! So “hold fast” to that which is good. As Paul said, “Hold fast the form of sound words which thou hast heard of me, in faith and love which is in Christ Jesus” (2Tim.1:13). And as Jesus said, “Hold that fast which thou hast, that no man take thy crown” (Rev.3:11). 17. Another danger in reading such anti-Family material is that it’s human nature to be more inclined to believe the negative than the positive. It’s odd, don’t you think, how readily people will believe the negative words of someone they’ve never met and know very little about, rather than the words from Peter and me who they have known for years via the Letters? Here you’ve been in the Family for years and years, or even all your lives, and obviously you’re happy in the Family and want to serve the Lord or you wouldn’t still be here. But then you read some letter or e-mail in which a stranger tells you how this, that, and the other is wrong, evil, and pernicious, and you’re really shaken by it and feel very confused. I’m not faulting you for that, as I know these writings are demonically persuasive. But why do you think that is? 18. Consider these possible reasons:

1) You live with good, kind people--people you can trust. You enjoy the loving environment of our Homes, and you who have grown up in the Family have known little else. As a result you want to have faith in humanity in general; you believe in people. 2) It’s hard to deny a story that someone says actually happened to them. People tend to be quite swayed by these specific examples and stories that bitter antagonistic former members tell. Unbeknownst to the reader, many of those examples and stories are only partly true or not true at all. They’re presented with such seeming sincerity, however, that you think, “Surely they wouldn’t be lying, not about all those details!” There are many sides to every situation, and a number of angles from which a story can be recounted. If someone who is unhappy, bitter, and full of grievances is telling you something that happened to them in the Family, then their rendition is probably going to be tainted by their bitterness and grievances. That’s just a fact of life. If someone else were to recount the same event, you might be quite surprised at the differences. I’m sure you’ve experienced this yourself when trying to match up an account of something that happened many years ago with someone else who was also there. Everybody sees things through their own perspective, and depending on what was happening to you at the time, the “color of your glasses” can be incredibly different and you can see things in an entirely different light. In the case of people who are overcome with bitterness, while their rendition of the story might contain some truth, there’s probably a lot more truth that, if it were known, would change the picture considerably. 3) People can sometimes tend to be too open-minded or naïve, to the point that they’ll believe almost everything they hear. 4) Some people may also feel that they will be ignorant or uniformed unless they take in as much input as possible from every direction--not bothering to clearly establish their personal value system and refine their discernment skills so that they can determine what “input” is worth taking seriously and what isn’t. 5) Some people see themselves as inquisitive, analytical, or skeptical, and many pride themselves in these traits. They feel that this attitude protects them, makes them open-minded and keeps them from being taken advantage of. Sadly, though, they’re often only skeptical of the things they’ve been taught all their life, and not skeptical enough of strangers or those who appear kind but have questionable intentions. It’d be much better if people like this would use their skeptical, analytical, questioning minds in a broader sense--that rather than only questioning their beliefs and foundations, they would instead question those who seek to undermine them, and investigate and consider and ponder and get to the bottom of why these people say what they do. 6) Some people haven’t had much close contact with people who aren’t in the Family but know a lot about the Family, and they’re curious as to how those people see us. They know their sheep and friends and contacts, who know about our beliefs and methods to varying degrees, but they don’t personally know many “neutral” or negative people who know a lot about the Family. So when they hear from or meet a former member who was in the Family for many years, their natural instinct is, first of all, to want to trust and believe that person; and secondly to want to know how that person sees things, to get more of an “outside perspective.” If you want to get the opinion of outside observers, though, why not go to those who just about everyone in the world would consider objective sources--the many academics who have studied the Family? People who have been in the Family in the past are obviously going to be personally involved and will have personal reasons for saying whatever they say about the Family, whether good or bad. It’s a different story with people who haven’t been in the Family but have studied us. These are for the most part practical, intellectual social scientists who have put the Family under a magnifying glass and analyzed it. These academics who have studied the Family have, for the most part, heard or read all the bad and lies that have been published about us. It’s not that we’ve sheltered them and given them a candy-coated version of the truth. They’ve read all the bad there is, have waded through court documents and testimonies of former members, many of them have read all the lit that has been used against us, and many of them have read a great number of our publications. They’ve based their conclusions on a well-rounded picture and have by no means been sheltered from the lies and accusations that are leveled against us. Their basic conclusions are that, while our current beliefs and lifestyle are definitely a bit unusual, even odd, they aren’t harmful to anyone; that we should have the right to live and believe as we like, and that by doing so we in fact positively contribute to society. (See the article on page 46, “Scholarly Studies on the Family.”) 7) There’s also a bit of inherent rebelliousness in most of us. That’s the nature of man. What that means is that even if you know the truth and you know something is right, still, you can be tempted to do the opposite or to question it or to try something different, just because you don’t want to submit to authority or obey. 8) Another part of the problem is a familiarity with the Lord and His Word. It’s a wonderful privilege to receive the Lord’s Words, both in print through His appointed prophets and leaders and personally through His voice of prophecy. But sad to say, many in the Family have become pretty spoiled on both counts. We had Dad giving the Lord’s Word, vision, and revelations to us for 25 years, and now we’ve had an abundance of prophecy and direction given to us on a multitude of subjects. If you don’t stay on guard and in the fear of the Lord, you can lose your respect for the Word and grow familiar with it. How does this play into the question of believing the words of man over the Lord’s Words? Well, since we are human and often more carnally minded than spiritually minded, it’s easier to receive the words of a fellow human who we can see, feel, and audibly hear, than it is to believe and receive the Lord’s Words, which we have to take by faith. When someone is expressing their views or their version of “what really happened,” you’re reliving the drama of it with them, sometimes in great detail. It can be pretty persuasive, and people tend to swallow whatever another person tells them hook, line, and sinker, especially if they add details that make it appear that they recall every conversation and circumstance and use the added weight of the phrase, “I was there!”

Face the Light! 19. “But why,” you may ask, “would hearing or reading such things have such a detrimental effect on my faith if they’re really and truly lies?” Dad answered this question many years ago in the Letter “The Crystal Pyramid” (ML #214). The answer is a spiritual principle that is not easily understood by the carnal mind. When you read such material you undergo a spiritual change, you enter a spiritual battle, so the only way to understand its danger is to see things from a spiritual point of view. 20. Let’s look at “The Crystal Pyramid” and the illustration that Dad gave us. The Lord and His Word, truth, and voice of prophecy represent the light--the pulsating light that gives us all the wonderful benefits that we have when we live and obey the Lord’s Word. Conversely, the darkness is the Enemy’s power, and he tries to lure people into the darkness through doubts, lies, and any other tactic he can muster. 21. The main point brought out in that Letter was the need for the crystals--which symbolize us--to keep our faces turned toward the light, in order for the darkness to have no hold or power over us. The Letter says:

22. It’s strange! As long as the crystals face the Light and the Pillar, they seem to absorb the Light, and they have strength and they glow brightly and are drawn toward it, and the Darkness has no power over them! But if they turn their facets or faces away from the Pillar, it is like a polarization! The changed position in relation to the Pillar seems to shut off some of the Light, and the Light grows dim as the crystal turns away! 23. If it turns toward the Darkness rather than the Light, the crystal loses its brilliance, and it’s as though the Darkness closes in and has greater power! As the light diminishes in the crystal, the Darkness has more power to slow it down from being drawn into the Pillar--even to be drawn away! The darker the crystal is, the more it is drawn by the Darkness, as it faces the Darkness! The moment it turns its face towards the Light, it immediately begins to glow with the great brilliance of the Light and Power, and is immediately drawn toward the Pillar, and the Darkness has no power over it! 24. You must face the Light! You dare not turn away from the Light or look backward, or you seem to lose the Light! It seems like only your face is able to absorb the Light. The crystal has to face the Light in order to glow itself, and to shine with such beauty, and especially the Power in that Light that drives off the Darkness! 25. But if the crystal turns away from the Light, as though it were trying to turn itself and fight the Darkness in its own strength, it loses the Light, and it has no Power unless it focuses itself on the Pillar and receives that beam of Light! Every time it turns away it grows darker, and its strength fades and wanes, as the Light is diminished in trying to face the Darkness instead of facing the Light! (ML #214:45-48)

26. (Mama:) When you keep your face--your crystal--facing the light, then you’re pulled in closer and you see things as the Lord sees them. You’re able to receive the Lord’s Words, His truth, and you’re fed and grow thereby. But if you begin to listen to the Enemy, whether outright or when he cleverly packages his message in the deceptive covering of a friend telling you about some of his bad experiences, sharing his reasoning with you, or complaining about his gripes, and tearing down the Word or Family leadership, then your face begins to turn toward the darkness. And as Dad brought out, when a crystal turns even a bit toward the darkness, then the darkness has some power over it, and you can be pulled further and further into the darkness. 27. If you’ve wondered why some seemingly very strong people have left the Family after hearing such accounts from former members, that’s one reason why. They allowed themselves to turn their faces away from the light, and consequently the darkness had more power over them. Every time a person turns away, they lose strength and power, until finally they lose the glow from the light and don’t shine with its beauty anymore. 28. Sad to say, this is what has happened to many people who were once part of us, who once pulsated with the light and were very much in unity and agreement with the Lord’s Words and the way He led us, but now see things very differently. Why? Because they’ve removed their face from the light and have changed their position. So they don’t see the glow, the beauty, and the blessings and power of the light as they used to before. 29. When rebutting former members’ comments about their doubts, grievances, bitterness, stories about failed or false prophecy, accounts of bad things that Family leadership has done, etc., I’m not saying that every single thing that a former member tells you is a complete lie. In some cases former members had negative things happen to them, and we are sorry for these things and have apologized in print numerous times. However, in many other cases, when the person telling the story is trying to make the Family sound bad, they will tell you the story in a way that brings out as much negative as possible without telling you the full truth of the situation. If they told you the full story, most likely you would get a very different, more positive or balanced picture. However, they don’t want that, as they’re trying to convince you that they were treated so badly, or that the Family is so terrible.

Is the Family God’s Will for You? 30. Peter and I will set the record straight in these GNs. That is our responsibility as your shepherds, one which we gladly accept. What you must realize, however, is that we can only do so much. We can tell you the truth, we can point you to Jesus, give you His answers, show you the other side, and explain needed spiritual principles, but we can’t make up your mind for you. 31. You must determine what you personally believe and have the faith for and faith in. There are those who want to discredit Dad, me, Peter, the Word and the Family. Where do you stand? What are you going to believe--man’s word or God’s Word? 32. This isn’t hype or coercion or spiritual abuse. Nor do I have to defend my position or our doctrines as if I’m on trial for wrongdoing. I’m not perfect. I’m only human, and I make mistakes too. But I have full faith that the direction Peter and I are leading the Family is the Lord’s will. I believe that what we publish in the GNs is the Lord’s Word for today. 33. If you step back and think about it, you’ll see that what is going on is a debate regarding religious beliefs. Peter and I and those who choose to be in the Family have certain beliefs, as articulated in the Letters. There are those who despise and detest those beliefs and are trying to convince you that they’re false, wrong or unchristian. This is a matter of religion. Why should it surprise us that there are those who disagree with much of what makes the Family different--Dad, our sexual freedom under the Law of Love, our hearing from spirits, the “Loving Jesus” revelation, the desire for our children to be full-time disciples of Jesus, and the New Wine? And they consider you a mindless zombie for believing in such things. It’s none of their business what you do in your private life, how you use the gift of prophecy, what kind of personal relationship you have with Jesus, or how you raise your children--as long as they’re not being harmed in any way, which they’re not, as the courts have proven time and time again! 34. It has always been this way. There’s nothing new about this attack. The details are different, but the goal is the same: to try to convince you that the beliefs and practices of the Family are ungodly, with the hope that you’ll leave, and to justify to themselves and others why they left. 35. Now I ask you a simple question: Do you believe that being in the Family is God’s will for you? That really is the crucial question. Do you believe you’re in God’s will or not? 36. If you believe you’re in God’s will, which I’m sure most of you do believe or you wouldn’t be in the Family, then you have to choose who you’re going to let influence your mind, heart, and spirit. If you don’t believe you’re in God’s will, then you should go elsewhere. But whatever you do, you should do it wholeheartedly; don’t be double-minded, allowing yourself to be blown about by every opposing opinion that comes along. Don’t be like some who say, “Well, I like the Family, but I don’t agree with some of our doctrines. I like what we accomplish, but I don’t like the way Mama and Peter run things, etc.” If you have serious doubts and disagreements, you’re going to have to come to grips with them sooner or later and be either all the way in or all the way out. 37. You can’t stay sitting on the wall for very long. If you want to stay, we want you to stay, but please stay with all your heart. If you want to go and you have big questions about the Family or about us that you can’t get reconciled by what we or the Lord or your shepherds say to you, or even by hearing from the Lord yourself, then please go. You’re not going to be happy staying and you’re not going to be able to accomplish much for the Lord in that double-minded state, because as the Word says, “Let not that man think that he shall receive any thing of the Lord” (Jam.1:7). 38. Peter and I have no desire whatsoever to try to persuade anyone to stay in the Family if he or she is not personally convinced that this is God’s will. We invite you to leave; in fact, we ask you to leave. And in saying this, I’m not heaping on you any of that so-called “intense manipulative spiritual control” by means of guilt or condemnation, as some have accused me of. I want each of you to find what will make you happy and where you will be most fruitful for the Lord, according to your own faith. The Family is not for everyone. 39. Now, as we put the ball in your court to decide what you’re going to believe, please don’t let the Enemy convince you that just because you’re a bit destabilized by this attack, the Family is no longer the place for you. The Enemy is hitting hard, and it’s natural that you could feel a little shaken or be hit with questions or even doubts that you never had before. But if you truly want to believe, the Lord can help you to overcome--He’s done it many times before! So don’t be scared by the Enemy’s boo! If you’re being hit, it doesn’t mean that you’re a doubter; it means that the Enemy’s trying to get you to quit! Don’t let this attack of the Enemy frighten you out of your place of service and your crown! Hold on! Fight back! Read this GN with an open mind and heart, and any questions which aren’t answered in the GN, ask the Lord about them. Do your part to hang on; the storm will eventually pass, and you’ll be stronger for it. 40. Please, as you read this GN, seriously reflect on your own personal conviction and beliefs. Because I don’t want you to suffer such unhappy and unfruitful double-mindedness as some apparently have. That’s sad and unnecessary. As I have said many times, there are many other ways to serve the Lord, and you don’t have to be in the Family to win souls. I personally feel the Family is the best place to not only serve the Lord but also to prepare spiritually for the future. But my faith is not enough for you. You must decide yourself what you believe and where you stand.

This Is Spiritual Warfare and the Enemy Is Fighting You Personally! 41. Having said all that, I also want to point out another side of the picture which is crucial that you understand. Each of you is being tested. These attacks on your faith are part of the spiritual warfare. Because the Enemy is fighting you personally, please pray desperately before you give up your place of service in the Family, making sure you’re fully persuaded in your own heart and that you’re not just following someone else’s negative, bitter assessment of your faith, religious beliefs, and Peter’s and my leadership. 42. Some people get a little resentful or upset when problems are explained in spiritual terms. I understand that some accuse me of explaining away any confrontations or accusations or persecution as “attacks of the Enemy” or “the Lord purging the Family.” Some don’t see the reality of the situation, and therefore think that’s my little defense mechanism. I can understand that you might feel that way, because “the natural man receives not the things of the Spirit” (1Cor.2:14). 43. But the truth is, we are fighting a spiritual warfare and the Enemy is attacking. He always has! Don’t just take my word for it--read your Bible! He’s fighting you, me, Peter, and the Family as a whole with everything he’s got! It’s real! To truly discern what’s happening, you have to rise above the finite, narrow mind of man and see with the eyes of the spirit. Consider the following verses from the Bible, which you know so well. Ask the Lord to help you look at them in a fresh light, applying them to your present situation:

Though we walk in the flesh, we do not war after the flesh: (For the weapons of our warfare are not carnal, but mighty through God to the pulling down of strong holds;) Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ (2Cor.10:3-5).

We wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places (Eph.6:12).

Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the Devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour (1Pet.5:8).

Lest Satan should get an advantage of us: for we are not ignorant of his devices (2Cor.2:11).

And the Lord said, Simon, Simon, behold, Satan hath desired to have you, that he may sift you as wheat: But I have prayed for thee, that thy faith fail not (Luke 22:31-32).

44. Acceptance of the existence of a spiritual warfare is crucial to understanding what’s going on and to gaining the faith and strength you need to make wise decisions. As Dad has taught us, when you go over the top, that’s when the Enemy starts shooting. We must be doing something right to have these attacks come up now. There’s a reason why he’s fighting so hard, which the Lord explains in this next message.

Each of You Will Be Tested 45. (Jesus speaking:) The fact that you’ve entered the era of action means that the action has been upped in every area--including the area of the Enemy’s attacks against you. This is destined to be, in many ways, the greatest era since the beginning of the world, because it will be the era of the greatest witness this world has known so far. It will be the era when many are brought to a decision, when there is potential for My Word to go out like never before. The Enemy knows that and is furious, and he is doing all he can to keep My children from entering in with their whole hearts. This attack on your faith is but one of his attacks. 46. This era is destined to be great. This is the era that many prophets and righteous men desired to see and participate in. They see the potential that exists for getting out the Word and My message in these days before the final showdown. They know how important it is that people receive the Word so that they are qualified to make their decisions later. They know how important this era is--that, in fact, the final Endtime events cannot come about until this era has been played out. So of course they all want to participate! They see the potential for these days, and they know that this could be the era of the greatest witness ever. It stands to reason that for such a great honor as participating in this era of action there would be some price attached. And so there is. You, My children of David, have all been through testings and purgings over the last few years. You’ve been tried in many areas. There have been hurdles to leap, strong meat to swallow, calls to obey in areas that are difficult. You have each personally crossed the Jordan, and those of you who are still here have a more intimate relationship with Me than before. 47. You might feel that after all that, you deserve to enter in; there should be no question about it. That’s because you don’t comprehend how great this era will be, how far-reaching the effects of your personal actions and decisions during this crucial time will be. This is a crucial part of the culmination of world history as you know it. This era will be the last chance for many to receive the full message, the meat of the Word, in these days when you can spread it abroad relatively easily. This is the chance for many to know the truth, to make the right decisions, to receive Me without having seen Me. This is such an important time--you have no idea! 48. The Enemy is furious, as I said before. He’s fighting very hard, and I will allow each of you to be tested. These tests will not be easy. This challenge to your faith is one of those tests. Those of you who have heard or read the thoughts of some of your former members can testify to their persuasiveness. But in My eyes, it is no more than one of the carefully masterminded attacks that the Enemy is throwing at My green beret troops. 49. It’s field-testing time, to see what you’ll do with the new weapons that you’ve learned to use, to see what you’ll do under extreme circumstances, because the days to come will be full of them. This will not be the last test, or the only one. Be prepared, My children, and be ready to fight for your place--because it’s a place of great honor, with guaranteed victory. It is not given for free. There is a price to be paid. If you’re willing to pay it, congratulations! You will participate in a spectacular show of My anointing, power and strength--which will be given freely in order to complete this stage of world history. These are the days all the prophets have dreamed of! (End of message from Jesus.)

50. (Mama:) To review the main points covered so far:

* This is an attack on your religious freedom. People who despise and detest your beliefs and lifestyle are trying to convince you that they’re false, wrong or unchristian, with the ultimate hope that you’ll leave the Family.

* This attack is aimed largely at you young people.

* The same things were said of Dad and similar things were said of Jesus.

* There are those who disagree with much of what makes the Family different--Dad, our sexual freedom under the Law of Love, our hearing from spirits, the “Loving Jesus” revelation, the desire for our children to be full-time disciples of Jesus, and the New Wine.

* You must determine what you personally believe and have the faith for. Will you believe man’s word or God’s?

* Do you personally believe it’s God’s will for you to be in the Family?

* You’re free to leave at any time. I want each of you to find what will make you happy and where you will be most fruitful for the Lord, according to your own faith.

* Peter and I do not demand that you not read the writings of former members. That is your choice, one which I hope you would ask the Lord about. Remember the spiritual principle from “Crystal Pyramid”: You must keep your face turned toward the light to absorb the light. If you turn your face toward the darkness, the negativity, then you start losing the light and the power and strength you need.

* It’s much easier to believe the negative than the positive.

* There are many places to serve the Lord. If you don’t believe the Letters or have faith in our fundamental doctrines, then you would do well to go somewhere else rather than continuing to live a life you consider a lie.

* We are engaged in spiritual warfare and the Enemy is fighting you personally.

* Each person will be tested before being given the anointing to fully participate in the era of action and partake of all the promises it holds, but the rewards will be well worth the fight!

Dad’s Death and Departing Family Members 51. There is another point I want you to be aware of before we move on to answer some of the accusations that have been made against us. 52. It’s been almost six years since Dad went to be with the Lord. While there has been a great deal of progress made during these past six years, they haven’t been easy years. Dad was the founder of our religious movement. He was our earthly shepherd for 25 years. We were all used to his style of leadership and we were comfortable with the way he talked to us through the Letters. 53. All of a sudden one day, things changed. Dad was called Home to Heaven and the reins of the Family were given to me. Although this wasn’t a surprise, as Dad had made it clear throughout the years that I would be his successor, and the transition was a natural one in that I had already been writing Letters to the Family in the years before Dad’s Homegoing, it was still a change in many ways: My style of leadership is somewhat different; the GNs include more prophecy; the Lord started moving the Family in new ways, and He gave us some new revelations and amplified some of those given to Dad in the past. Within just a few months of Dad’s Homegoing, the Charter was released. All of this, when added together, has been an immense amount of change for us, as it would be for any religious movement. 54. Sociologists who study religious movements know that upon the death of the founder there are often difficulties within the movement. Often what happens is that there are leadership struggles which weaken it. Sometimes those struggles lead to splinter groups forming as a result of people near the top feeling jealous or insecure, or feeling they no longer have the same standing with the new leader as they did with the old. Some have difficulty with the new direction the new leader is steering the movement in. Some just liked it the way it was and want it to continue that way, and when it doesn’t, they become discontent. Sometimes they try to cause trouble and sometimes they leave; sometimes they do both. 55. We’ve had our share of people leave the Family since Dad’s passing. Some have been leaders or old-time Family members. Thankfully, for the most part these folks have moved on with their new lives. 56. A few of those who have left have become vocal against Peter and me. This is to be expected. The history of religious movements is full of examples of this happening when the founding leader dies. We’re just thankful that the Lord and Dad prepared the Family for years for Dad’s death and the passing of the torch to me. You, the Family, are very resilient, and this combination made for a smooth transition between Dad’s leadership and mine. 57. But it should not surprise you that some of those who were either leaders or who worked with or near leadership would begin to speak disparagingly against Peter and me, the new leadership. It’s predictable; it has happened time and again throughout history. When you hear of these people speaking in such a manner, you should try to remember that this is not unusual, but something that has happened to many of those who lead religious movements after the death of the founder. 58. Several sociologists of religion have conducted studies of those who leave religious movements. These sociologists have pointed out that there are numerous reasons people choose to leave a religious group. The majority move on with their lives, adjust to life outside of the group, and in time adjust their belief system accordingly. These people have an outlook on their time in the movement ranging from remembering it as a happy time to a somewhat troubled time which they have moved on from. 59. There are some, however, who after some time, for various reasons, begin to see their time in the movement as extremely negative. This seems to occur more often when they hook up with someone negative or someone’s writings that are negative about the movement, including those involved in the “anti-cult movement.” 60. When this happens, the person who previously strongly adhered to the beliefs of the movement now begins to see it all as evil. Virtually all of their past involvement is now seen as destructive; those that they used to love, they now hate. They basically have nothing but bad to say about the group, its doctrines, and especially its leadership. 61. Much has been written by some foremost sociologists of religion regarding this state, referring to such former members as “apostates.” Although the sociologists will accept that there is some truth to what the apostate says, studies have indicated that much of it is also slanted or distorted by their negative outlook and attitude, and therefore cannot be taken simply at face value. 62. I’m telling you this because you’re sometimes faced with listening to or reading material from people who would be considered “apostates.” You should take this information into consideration when deciding whether to believe their testimony.

Accusations and Answers 63. Now let’s go on to some of the accusations you might have heard or read.

64. ACCUSATION: It took Maria and Peter years to admit the obvious; sexual abuse of minors had occurred in the Family, MO was directly responsible for it, and that it is a sin in the eyes of God. Neither MO, Maria, nor Peter were ever truly sorry for advocating that adults have sexual contact with minors. They were terribly sorry, however, that after years the court forced them to publicly admit that MO was wrong, and responsible for the harm that children had suffered.

65. (Mama:) It is sad that issues that have been resolved for years are once again brought up, but because they have been, I will address them once again. Before doing so, I want to point out that the claim that Peter and I are not sorry for any hurt that happened to individuals in the Family is absolutely false. We are very sorry that anyone was hurt, and have publicly apologized and have asked for forgiveness in various Letters or other publications. (See the 1992 Statement on Child Abuse; “Our Beliefs Concerning the Lord’s Law of Love,” ML #2858:50-51, published in 6/93; “An Answer to Him That Asketh Us,” ML #3016:18-20, 52-56, published in 9/95; Mama’s Letter to Former Members in “Bridging the Gap,” ML #3068:101- 108, published in 8/96; “An Open Letter to All Current and Former Family Members,” ML #3091:3,10h,15-22, published in 12/96.) 66. If some choose not to believe or accept our apology, that is their prerogative, but God knows our hearts. We are sorry about anyone who has been hurt in any way during their time in the Family. Not only are we sorry, but we have established firm rules regarding sexual contact between adults and minors, making it an excommunicable offense in 1986. We have also included clear rules and punishment in the Charter to ensure that no harm of any kind related to sexual or physical abuse happens, and if it does, that those who caused it can be disciplined. Our apologies were not only words, but actions which have significantly changed the governance of the Family.

• * *

67. Some are going to great lengths to try to convince you that it was the intention of Dad, Peter and me to deliberately hurt young people, and that we were maliciously promoting child abuse and deceiving people. I’m saddened that this subject has come up again, for several reasons: 68. - You who have read certain writings from former members have had to wade through an interpretation of events and our doctrine that is confusing, depressing, and wrong. While there is some truth to it, there is a definite “spin” put on it, and the conclusions, insinuations, and second guesses of our motives and reasoning are not true. 69. - It’s a shame that we are once again dragged into the past and forced to rebut accusations that have long been resolved and apologized for. There are people who are not content that testimony has been given in courts of law in numerous countries around the world, and that in every case the Family has been victorious. Some of our victories were appealed, yet the appeals were thrown out by higher courts. In a number of cases, the Supreme Court of the country passed judgment in our favor. In the case in England, a High Court judge ruled that the Family was a safe place for children. 70. Unfortunately, some people seem driven to become a type of vigilante in search of their own interpretation of “justice.” They don’t seem to place much credence in the fact that in every single case, the judicial systems of numerous countries have all concluded the same thing--that the Family is a safe place. 71. When all is said and done, no matter what claims these detractors may make, the truth is still the truth: Major changes have been made in the Family. Any hurt that was caused to young people in the past will not be repeated, and mechanisms are in place to ensure that it isn’t. No children have been taken permanently from the Family in the various large-scale persecutions we have faced. And after a very long and drawn-out custody case, the High Court in England judged the Family a safe place and awarded the care of the child to the mother in the Family. 72. Some of our detractors say that Peter’s letter to the judge published in “An Answer to Him That Asketh Us” (ML #3016, Lifelines 22) was a frantic whitewash attempt to get the judge off our backs. That is not true. The message in this GN represents what the Lord showed Peter and me after a great deal of prayer and counsel over many months. We were sincere about what we wrote, we stand by it today, and Family policy reflects this stance. 73. It seems that many Family members do not understand the explanations in this GN. Maybe you didn’t realize that it has an important message that is for the Family as well as for the judge to whom it was written. If you don’t have a clear understanding of these matters, we suggest you study this GN carefully. 74. A review: The judge in the British case stated that in order for him to award the care of the child to the mother, he needed assurances from WS that would ensure the safety of the child. In short, those included: - changes in the Family child discipline rules for children in the United Kingdom, - points regarding the education of our children, - continued openness and contact with relatives, - to acknowledge that because of Dad’s writings, he was responsible for some children in the Family in the past being subjected to sexually inappropriate behavior, and that he was therefore wrong to write such things. 75. In “An Answer to Him That Asketh Us” I stated: “With 20/20 hindsight we can look back and see that it would have been better to explain things more clearly. We should have anticipated potential problems and put in more stringent rules to keep them from happening, including prohibitions on all adult/minor sexual contact. By not having such restrictions in place, some people were able to act in ways that were harmful to others. 76. “Because of the insight Dad gave into the Scriptures which granted us a great deal of sexual freedom, without clearly stated explicit restrictions that prohibited all sexual activity between adults and minors, it resulted in actions that caused harm to some children. He must therefore bear responsibility for the harm. Today it’s easy to see that it was wrong not to put explicit restrictions in place earlier, but Dad didn’t see the need for such explicit rules when he first introduced sexual freedoms” (ML #3016:16-17). 77. Dad himself apologized from the spirit world, admitting that he did hurt others at times by his words and actions. He now knows and acknowledges that he was wrong to have introduced the Law of Love without clear boundaries prohibiting sexual contact between adults and minors. I’m sure there are those who despise and reject his after-death apology, but what else do you expect? He had gone to be with the Lord when I wrote this GN and Peter wrote his letter to the judge. For those who believe in Dad’s ability to speak from beyond, you know that this was his sincere request for forgiveness. 78. Some vehemently criticize me for what they say is careless, blind protection of Dad and an unwillingness to admit he was wrong. While I don’t believe the general principles of the Law of Love as the Lord revealed them to Dad are wrong, I have stated clearly in the above-mentioned GN that Dad was wrong to not clearly state explicit restrictions that prohibited all sexual activity between adults and minors from the beginning. Now we know. We are much wiser today than yesterday. 79. What I’m saying here is not new. We published this Letter five years ago, and for the most part, people accepted what I wrote, including my and Peter’s apologies. Some would want you to think this was done in some nefarious way and that we did not mean what we said. This is not the case. We meant every word of it. We clearly stated all of this in 1995 and are just repeating this to show how ludicrous such accusations are. 80. Let’s remember that 14 years ago, in 1986, Dad and I banned all sexual activity between adults and minors. This was years before the Family was involved in large court cases, and therefore it cannot be said that we made this ban under pressure from the courts or the System. In 1988, again years before any court cases, sex with a minor became an excommunicable offense, and it very explicitly remains so in the Charter. 81. In 1988 we published the “Child Abuse?!” tract in which Dad made the definitive statement, “We do not approve of sex with minors, and hereby renounce any writings of anyone in our Family which may seem to do so! We absolutely forbid it!” This clearly showed Dad’s stance regarding the matter. 82. Later, in the Letter “An Answer to Him That Asketh Us,” we used the definitions of the words in that sentence in order to further clarify our position, so that it read: “We do not consider it right or good, we do not think or speak favorably of, nor do we officially [or unofficially] consent to, confirm or sanction sex with minors. As a result of this fact, I reject, disown, abandon and give up by open profession every single writing of any person in the Family which may appear to approve of it. Without condition or limitation, we command the Family not to indulge in sex with minors” (ML #3016:26). 83. In that same statement of 1988 Dad renounced all literature, including his own, that indicated in any way that sexual activity with minors was permissible. Based on his renunciation of such Family literature, he approved our lit purges, which expunged all such literature, no matter who it was written by, including his own. Dad didn’t just renounce his old writings; he had them destroyed. 84. The Letter “Child Abuse: A Final Warning” was published in 1989, a few months after the 1988 Child Abuse statement came out. In it, we stated: “We’ve already put out an urgent notice to the Family and to the whole world that we don’t do such things, and we mean it, we don’t do it!--And anybody who does is in serious trouble, not only with the world but with us!” (ML #2536:10). 85. Also in 1989 the Letter “D.O. Is for DOers of the Word!” (ML #2531) was published, in which Dad listed the excommunicable offenses, including the following:

14. Sex with Minors We do not advocate nor practice sex between adults and minors (someone who is under-age)...Any such practice is strictly forbidden within our group and anyone found guilty of such will be automatically and immediately excommunicated--totally severed from receiving any literature or from having any contact with the Family whatsoever. (Right!--D.) (LNF 121:10)

86. Here’s an excerpt of LNF 121, which was also sent out in 1989:

10. “Whoso shall offend one of these little ones!” …We want to reiterate that the “Child Abuse” tract was not only our official statement to the System but also our official statement to any Family members, part-time or otherwise, that any such practice is strictly forbidden within our group, and anyone found guilty of such will be automatically and immediately excommunicated--totally severed from receiving any literature or from having any contact with the Family whatsoever! (Right!--D.)

87. In April of 1992, the “Statement on Attitudes, Conduct, Current Beliefs and Teachings Regarding Sex” was published. Here are excerpts from that document:

6. Sexual relationships between adults and teens. Although the laws in many countries do allow adults to have relationships with teens of legal age, communities in our fellowships strictly disallow it. Our membership has unanimously agreed to respect a total ban within our communities on any and all sexual contact between adults (defined as anyone 21 years of age and over) and anyone under 21 years of age, under penalty of excommunication if not respected. [Note: In the “Offenses Warranting Excommunication” listed in the Charter, there are now specific variations on this rule for those between the ages of 18 and 27.] Teens are also expected to refrain from engaging in any form of sexually enticing activities or behavior specifically aimed at provoking a sexual response in an adult. Normal warmth and affection may be shown between an adult and a teen, but it may not cross from a social exchange into an overtly sexual expression.

7. Sexual abuse of children. We are diametrically opposed to any form of sexual abuse or sexual exploitation of children whatsoever, and all our membership are resolute in their agreement to abide by and support this position under penalty of excommunication from our fellowship. Any and all previous writings, philosophic and theological speculations, or individual opinions of members taken contrary to this position or that in any way could be construed as lending credence, support or justification for any form of sexual touching of children, have been officially categorically renounced and forbidden, and all printed materials deemed objectionable have been ordered by our founder, Father David, to be removed from use and destroyed. Like all concerned parents, our members believe they must demonstrate or manifest love for their children in physical ways the children can relate to. We believe that showing natural, warm, non-sexual affection to children, such as a rewarding hug, a kiss on the cheek, a clasp of their hand or a pat on the shoulder, is critical to their emotional well-being. Affection that goes beyond that, however, involving any form of obviously sexual touching of children, or any minor, for that matter, is strictly forbidden in all of our communities. We feel assured that our communities are in fact much safer places in regard to these matters than one can find in much of society today.

88. As we became more aware of the intricacies of the court cases we were involved in at that time, it became obvious that we needed a clearer explanation of our official stance on adult/minor sex than the above few paragraphs. So in 1992 a second, more detailed statement on the subject of child abuse was published, entitled: “Our Replies to Allegations of Child Abuse.” 89. Mounting a legal defense is a very complex, detailed undertaking. Cases are won and lost on choices of minute wording. The laws are very specific, and therefore the explanation of your defense and rights also has to be very specific, as well as presented in the legalese that judges will be judging matters and basing their conclusions on. We had to be very accurate in our choice of wording in our official stance regarding the child abuse charge. It would be considered totally irresponsible in anyone’s book to put forth a defense by using haphazard, unprofessional vocabulary that you think means one thing but which means something entirely different to the judge, or one that was not detailed enough or complete enough to provide a decent defense. Because later, if it dawns on you that something you submitted as evidence is not portraying your views or stance as you intended, you can’t say, “Oh, oops, we didn’t mean that. What we really mean is this.…” For that reason, and that reason only, we reissued the second Child Abuse statement in 1992. 90. At the same time those in WS also worked very hard to produce the Position and Policy Statements on many other important topics. I’m sure all the fathers and mothers whose children were returned to them after the false charges of sexual abuse were dismissed are thankful we were prayerful and thorough in the way we handled the charges against the Family.

91. The preceding excerpts of Letters and statements make it obvious that we had definite rules against sexual contact between adults and minors since 1986. As I said in “An Answer to Him That Asketh Us,” we should have had rules in effect much earlier that would have prevented any of our young people from being hurt. We didn’t, and we’re sorry we didn’t because it made it possible for some young people to be hurt. Adult/minor sex has been an excommunicable offense for 12 years. Any sexual crossovers in the Family are considered sin and they remain an excommunicable offense, which will be disciplined according to the guidelines in the Charter. If you are aware of any type of sexual impropriety, you know what to do--report it! In fact, those who do not report such things are guilty as well and subject to the same discipline.

92. We’ve been accused of flip-flopping in our stance on adult/minor sex. We haven’t. It is clear that 14 years ago, in 1986, Dad and I put a ban on any adult/minor sexual activity. In 1988, 12 years ago, we made it excommunicable and it has remained so since then. We made it quite clear that any such activity was wrong and not allowed within our communities. While the theological discussion may have continued, the fact is that any adult/minor sex was excommunicable. In 1995 the Lord spoke explicitly on the subject. Here is an excerpt from that GN:

(Jesus speaking:) “The bounds that I have set, because I have set them, are the boundaries, and you are to go no further. For to go further is sin, for these are the boundaries that I have set. I have set these boundaries that these things would not be a testimony against you. I have set these boundaries in wisdom and in love. “As I lead you step by step, so did I lead your Father David step by step. So did he too learn the need for boundaries. And so did he set boundaries for your safekeeping, for your protection. So stay within the boundaries of God and sin not, for he that oversteps the boundaries sins in My sight. For these are the boundaries of God, the boundaries that your David has set forth by the wisdom of God. Remain within the boundaries and you are free. Step without the boundaries and you sin.…” (Mama:) Although the Lord has given us in the Family much freedom, there are, nevertheless, some restrictions. The Lord says clearly here that He, through Dad, has set some boundaries for us. He goes on to say that if we cross over those boundaries, it is sin. What are those boundaries? The boundaries that Dad put in place concerning sex were: 1) No sexual contact between adults and minors. 2) No male with male sexual activity. 3) No sex with outsiders. 4) No sex with new members until after their first six months in the Family. 5) Any sexual activity between adults must be done according to the Law of Love. These rules are all precisely reiterated in the Love Charter. What the Lord is saying is that if you break these rules, cross these boundaries, you are sinning. He said these boundaries were set up by Him. “The bounds that I have set, because I have set them, are the boundaries, and you are to go no further. For to go further is sin, for these are the boundaries that I have set.” What is it that gives us faith? The Word, right? “Faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the Word of God” (Rom.10:17). So if the Word gives you faith for something, like it does for us to have sexual fellowship with other consenting adults, then you can engage in those activities without sin. However, when the Word says that you cannot do something, then you cannot have the faith to do it, because you would be acting in disobedience to God’s Word. So to cross the boundaries the Lord, through His Word, has set up, is sin. (ML #3016:81,82,85-87).

93. As far as we’re concerned, that’s the final word on it. Any questions about whether adult/minor sexual contact is at all possibly permissible in theory or theologically were laid to rest. This overrides anything that was ever written suggesting otherwise. Once the Lord said it was sin, we announced it to the Family and that has been our stance since that time. 94. I want to emphasize this point, because I don’t want any of you thinking that our stance on this issue is ambiguous. The Lord made it clear at the time of “An Answer to Him That Asketh us” that all adult/minor sexual contact is sin. We consider it as such. It is wrong and results in excommunication. 95. Everyone knows, and numerous courts acknowledge, that solid safeguards have been put into place to protect young people in the Family from abuse, and as such, they are no more likely to suffer abuse than young people in society at large. You who are in the Family know that for 12 years any sexual crossover has been grounds for excommunication; you also know that you need to protect your young people and all young people in the Family from any abusive situation. You know that our official stance is that any form of adult/minor sex is a sin. If you know of any infraction of the Charter rules taking place, it is your duty to report it. This is a resolved point. 96. Our detractors, however, continue to bring it up and try to document supposed wrongdoing on my and Peter’s part. The facts stand. We’ve faced these accusations in many court cases and have won every time. We have admitted and apologized for the past, we have asked forgiveness, we have put strong rules in place, and we have moved on from all of this. My question is, why don’t they?

• * *

97. To be involved in a court case costs a lot of money. Thank the Lord He supplied the funds needed, and our lawyers were very generous and did a marvelous work for a very reduced fee, and in some cases the lawyers were provided by the government through legal aid. If there had been a way to end the court cases we were fighting earlier, believe me, we would have done it. Anyone who has been involved in any court case, especially a very complex one with many witnesses, knows that it’s not your call as to how quickly things move along. To insinuate that we deliberately dragged out the court case because we were unwilling to make the statements made in “An Answer to Him That Asketh Us” and we thereby wasted enormous amounts of the Lord’s money is unfounded! The idea that had we written “An Answer to Him That Asketh Us” earlier we could have avoided the whole case and saved loads of money is ridiculously simplistic. 98. We followed the Lord step by step, praying very desperately. And for those who might not remember or who were not intimately involved, we were fighting not only a custody case, but a battle for our right to religious freedom! The BI case, which is mentioned in some recent anti-Family materials, was not the only court case in progress at the time. We were also fighting cases in Spain, Argentina, Australia and France. We were engaged in an intense battle for our future and our children, one that Dad and Peter and I did not by any means take lightly. We remain very thankful to the Lord for the victories He delivered into our hands, though we were often like little David fighting the Goliath of the System. We are eternally thankful to the Lord for the wise decisions of the courts that have allowed us the right to exercise our religious freedom and raise our children in the nurture and admonition of the Lord.

• * *

99. Regarding physical abuse in the form of excessive corporal discipline, extended isolation, etc.: Peter and I are very sorry for the harsh and severe treatment some of you young people received in some Victor programs. Such treatment was wrong, and those who treated you that way were wrong to do so. 100. Peter recently reviewed the pubs that were written in the late ‘80s and early ‘90s about the care and training of our JETTs and teens at the time. These consisted of FSMs about the Victor camps, the Techi GN series, and a few other Letters to and about young people, their parents, and the need for the Family to tune in to the young people. 101. The main thrust of these publications was to help the JETTs and teens of that time period get more connected to the Lord and the Family. The FSMs that explained the Victor program emphasized the need for the shepherds to get involved with the young people’s lives, working with them, talking with them, teaching and training them. They talked about discipline as well. The discipline that was written about at the beginning of the Victor program seemed appropriate for the situation. There was mention of silence restriction and being isolated from the other teens and young people; however, it was never meant to be for long periods of time, as we later heard happened in some situations. 102. When addressing silence restriction in “Getting Back on Track, Part 3,” I wrote: “A few minutes of silence restriction can be a positive thing if used wisely, especially for younger groups of children who can get so rowdy sometimes that about the only way you can bring order is to have everybody be completely silent for a few moments. Or somewhat longer periods of silence restriction can occasionally be beneficial for JETTs or teens, as long as it’s not taken to the extreme” (ML #2892:67). 103. On isolation I wrote, “The use of the word ‘isolation’ for such a disciplinary method is a bit misleading, because ‘isolation’ implies that the person is completely alone, as if in solitary confinement. But in actuality, when problem people need to have some time apart from their peers, it is not with the intention that they be separated somewhere completely alone for long periods of time, without the warmth, support and encouragement of others. The whole point of such separation is so that the problem person can have a private time of prayer and reading the Word with the help and counsel of a shepherd or someone who is spiritually strong enough to help pull the person through his problems. Such times of separation can bear good fruit if they’re handled lovingly and wisely and not overused” (ML #2892:66). 104. In the same Letter I said:

105. The need for greater shepherding and direction and guidance is not a go-ahead for you adults to resort to an unloving, legalistic, harsh style of shepherding. I don’t want to see a backlash now to where you overreact and get overbearing, bossy, legalistic, condescending, demanding, and pushy, and go to the other extreme of harsh discipline, heavy restrictions, etc. 106. Harsh discipline is not the Family way or the Lord’s way! Dad and I have never advocated harsh, unloving, merciless, cruel discipline! How very sad if our dear people who have joined a Family of love only hear about that love in the Letters and do not experience it. How sad if all they see is harshness, legalism, self-righteousness, strict discipline, quenching of the Spirit, dependence on the arm of the flesh, and squelching of personal initiative and forbidding of good suggestions and counsel. 107. Such measures remind me of what Dad said in “Prayer for Love and Mercy” about the nurses who can’t stand to see the pain and suffering, so they harden themselves and let their hearts grow calloused until they become almost butchers of mankind. “Getting hard and tyrannical is a fleshly compensation, it’s not the Lord’s solution!” (See ML #75.) 108. I am not in agreement with isolation or silence restriction when it is practiced in an extreme manner. A few hours in a caravan studying the Word because it is a place to get alone and be quiet could be perfectly okay under certain circumstances. Sometimes there just aren’t any other free, quiet places for someone to go to for quiet time. And in some ways, it should be looked upon as a privilege to be able to get away from the hubbub of activity in a busy Home to have a few uninterrupted hours in a nice quiet caravan to concentrate on the Word. 109. Or in some cases, a teen may need to be separated from his peers for a few days of prayer and Word and personal shepherding, if he agrees to it, and if he’s doing so poorly that he’s infecting others with his problems and affecting everyone else very negatively. If a teen is in such poor spiritual condition that he’s bringing down his whole group and causing absolute havoc and requiring almost all the attention of the teen shepherd, to the neglect of the rest of the teen group, then to temporarily separate that teen from his peers may be the best solution. But such separation should be the last resort and should be for very limited periods of time. (ML #2892:60-62, 64-65, Lifelines 21).

110. During the time the Victor programs were underway, I wrote the 21 Letters that comprised the Techi Series. Anyone who read those Letters could clearly see that I was not promoting harsh discipline or cruelty, but rather the opposite--love, patience, listening, counseling, prayer, etc. 111. That’s not to say that such harsh discipline did not happen in some of the Victor programs, but I want to make it clear that this type of discipline was not Dad’s nor my policy. When we found out about it, we put a stop to it. 112. So while we did promote Victor programs, we did not know that some of them had turned so harsh. We were saddened to hear that some of you suffered. We again acknowledge that harsh, severe treatment of that type was and is wrong. We are very sorry we didn’t find out that it got so harsh until the programs had run their course. I apologized for this in ML #3016 and I do so again now. I am personally very sorry these things happened, as is Peter, and I apologize to any of you who suffered as a result of them. As you know, we have put rules in place in the Charter to prevent such harsh treatment from ever happening again. 113. Victor programs have not been in existence for years, and the conditions that made them possible no longer exist in our Homes. Our children are not in danger of being overdisciplined or harmed physically by their caregivers, as the discipline of the children in the Family is regulated by the Family Discipline Guidelines and the Charter. Here are important excerpts of the Charter:

CHILD DISCIPLINE RULES A. Child discipline in the Family is governed by the rules published in the “Family Discipline Guidelines,” ML #2919, GN 591.

RESPONSIBILITIES OF PARENTS H. Discipline their children according to the standard agreed upon by the voting members of the Home in which they reside, providing it is in accordance with the Child Discipline Rules on page 247 in the “Fundamental Family Rules” and more fully expounded in “Family Discipline Guidelines” (ML# 2919). Take appropriate action in disciplining their children whose behavior has become a reproach to the cause of Christ and/or reflects negatively on the Family. … No one is permitted to discipline any child more severely than what is allowed in the “Family Discipline Guidelines.” If they do, they will be violating the rights of the child and the “Fundamental Family Rules,” and will be in jeopardy of losing their Charter Member status. (The Charter, pp.69-70, 247).

114. We apologized for past hurts in Letters 2858, 3016, 3068 and 3091. (Please see full references listed in paragraph 65 above.) We again say that we are sincerely very sorry that any members of the Family (or former members who may be reading this) have been hurt through negative sexual experiences, or were treated unlovingly or harshly, or mistreated in Victor camps or in any other way by anyone during their time in the Family.

• * *

115. Now I want to talk about Mene for a moment. But before I do I want to say that I’m very sorry, Mene, for any and all harm and hurt you experienced when you lived in our Home or any other Home. Some years back I asked Sara to try to contact you so I could express my apology to you. The response we received was that you didn’t want to have any contact with Family members. I respected your wish and didn’t push the issue any further. I am afraid that since others have recently brought up the subject through letters to Family members and on the Web I am going to have to make some comment, but I wanted to first make this apology to you publicly. 116. Around the time that Mene left our Home we published the Letter “The Last State,” which talked about her time with us and which focused on the last months when the problems she was experiencing were at their height. Anyone who read that Letter knows that when Dad finally confronted the situation he did so with extremely strong words when shaking her, and with some corporal punishment in the form of spanking her with a cane. This is how Dad felt led to handle what he and we felt was a case of demon oppression or possession. Anyone who has ever had any real experience with exorcisms knows that there can be loud yelling, restraints, etc. 117. In all my years with Dad prior to this time I never saw him handle a situation in that manner, and after that time I never saw him do so again. It was harsh, and in looking back, having learned much more about dealing with young people with similar problems, I would say it was wrong to go to the extreme that Dad did in Mene’s case. I’m sorry that we didn’t have the experience and the knowledge we do now, and because we didn’t, Mene underwent this experience. 118. Of course, it’s easy for our critics to look back 12 or 13 years and say that we should have done this or that differently. They weren’t some of those who spent months of their time caring for a young teen who needed full-time care, talking with her, reading with her, praying with her, answering her questions, making sure she wasn’t doing physical damage to herself or others, etc. These people gave themselves in love to care for a loved one who was undergoing some serious problems. They were not harsh but rather were tender and loving. Everyone who was involved did all they could to help Mene, at great personal sacrifice, including Dad, who showed her love and concern both before and after yelling at her. 119. I’m not saying this to condone or justify the yelling, shaking and spanking with a rod, but I want to put it in perspective. This occurred only after many months of trying to help her in other ways--very loving ways. It was used as a last resort. I’m sorry it was used at all. I am also sorry that we published anything about it then or referred to it later, as it put a young girl who was having problems in a very bad light. 120. As I said earlier, it is not our policy to mete out harsh discipline. Over the years I have written numerous Letters about using love and understanding when faced with the problems of our young people, and we have very clear discipline rules that reflect our policy on this matter. 121. We still believe in laying hands on and praying for those who experience spiritual or mental problems. If the situation is serious in that the person is apt to cause harm to themselves or others, or if after prayer there is not an immediate improvement, then we recommend that they seek the help of the medical system, which has happened a few times over the past years. 122. Again, I want to apologize to any of those who have been hurt by any wrongdoing by anyone during their time in the Family. We ask your forgiveness. We have done all we can to prevent any such things happening again. The Family has changed, and even the judge who so strongly condemned some of the things that happened in the past officially stated in his written judgment that the Family is a safe place for children.

123. ACCUSATION: Mama is a control freak. Even though the Charter guarantees each Charter Member’s rights, as well as articulates his or her responsibilities, Mama still holds all the power and control through the GNs and prophecy.

124. (Mama:) Those of you who live on the field and use the Charter know that there is plenty of opportunity for you to be in control of your own lives, Homes, ministries, and decisions. Since the time of its implementation, Peter and I have heard many, many positive reactions about the Charter, and no one is looking to give it up. If it were so useless a document that put so little power into the hands of the people and local leadership, there would have been a groundswell of discontent and we would have abolished the Charter years ago. But that hasn’t been the case. 125. Each of you has the right to exercise your personal initiative, faith and choice in the use of your gifts, talents, education and experience as you feel best. You also can live in the Home of your choice, providing that Home will have you. Or, as everyone knows, you are free to depart from the Family at any time you choose. You have the right to bring up any matter in your Home Council and have it brought to a vote. You’re free to move from your present Home to another, or open your own Home at any time after submitting a 30-day notice. You have the right to be informed of the financial state of your Home, and if you’re 18 or older, to participate in all financial decisions. You have the right to make all medical decisions regarding yourselves and your children, and to communicate directly with your area officers. 126. Each Family Home has the right to choose its own officers, determine its own basic nature, goals and operating procedures--including how you will spend your time, what your outreach methods will be, and where you will live. Each Home is free to determine its personnel make-up and vote to revoke the Home membership of one of its members, and also to disband the Home at any time it chooses to do so. 127. Your Home Council has the power to recommend someone be reclassified or excommunicated. You decide collectively how you will educate your children, as well as discipline them and errant Home members. You decide if you will permit a non-CM young person to live in your Home and under what conditions you will do so. 128. Peter and I have very little to do with the day-to-day running of your Homes. Yes, Peter and I lead the Family spiritually as God’s appointed shepherds. But prayerfully determining the spiritual direction for the Family and receiving the Lord’s fresh Word from Heaven is not synonymous with “control”--because you are voluntarily in the Family. You signed the Charter Membership contract of your own accord, therefore you willingly decided to obey counsel put forth by the Lord via the GNs. That’s your choice, not control.

129. (Jesus speaking:) Maria and Peter are My servants, doing My bidding. They share with you what I show them, and they do so at the risk of being ridiculed, scorned, and even falsely accused. I am the One leading the Family, but I need your king and queen to be My embodiment for you. They didn’t ask for the great responsibility that they carry, but they carry it with joy and a great measure of prayerfulness and wisdom, because they love Me and they fear Me and it’s what I’ve asked them to do. 130. I’m the one leading the Family through your anointed shepherds. It’s not their ideas, or their programs, or their words, or their message. It’s all My doing. They’re just yielded vessels in My hands, humbly serving Me and you, their Family, who they love so dearly. So if you don’t like the way things are, or the way things are run, or the Word that is being published, don’t blame Maria and Peter--they’re just following Me. Ultimately I’m the One in charge, and they don’t make a move or change or do anything without My stamp of approval. 131. Your king and queen are giving their lives for you. They spend hours in My presence day after day, week after week, year after year, in order to be faithful messengers of My Words to you. They didn’t choose this job; I chose them. They’re dependent on Me, desperate with Me, and they’re giving their all--their time, health, blood, sweat and tears--for you. They’re leading you where I show them to lead you. They’re following Me so closely, and that’s why I’ve kept them in this place of honor as your king and queen. (End of message from Jesus.)

132. ACCUSATION: Mama and Peter shoot themselves in the foot by publishing ridiculously bizarre, controversial Letters. We’ve gotten over our problems of persecution, but then they go and publish something else that’s going to cause trouble. People try to tell them that their teachings and doctrines will bring the wrath of the System and the ire of man, but they won’t listen.

133. (Mama:) To hear some people talk, you’d think we were running some kind of a System business in which we produce our product according to the going market and preferences of the world climate. But we’re not. We’re a revolution! Yes, we’re a missionary movement, a publishing house, a follow-up machine in the making. We wear all kinds of different “hats,” but we’re also a revolution, as we have been from the beginning. 134. What makes us revolutionary is the Word we receive from the Lord--the New Wine. Why do you think the Lord calls it “New Wine” anyway? Because it’s new! 135. Peter’s and my primary responsibility before the Lord is to receive His Word and give it to you. Your primary job is to take that Word and give it to the world! The Family is different. Unlike the other churches and new religious movements, we’re not out to gain popularity. Like Dad said, “The prophets didn’t prophesy for audience reaction, to hear the laughs and the howls and the amen’s and the applause. They just spoke the Words of God, come what may, live or die, sink or swim, rise or fall, and that was that, flat!” (ML #303A:69). 136. We certainly don’t deliberately try to cause trouble and negative reactions from people outside the Family, but if it comes down to a choice between obeying God or compromising for fear of man, we will obey God. That was always Dad’s policy, and that is ours as well. 137. There are plenty of other churches and fellowships of very sincere Christians who love the Lord and want to be close to Him and who have a much more mainstream doctrine, if that’s what you’re looking for. But if you remain in the Family, you can expect new revelations, new truths, and new directions, because God still speaks today! 138. Let’s have a little reality check: Don’t forget God in the equation. The GNs are not some concoction from the minds of Peter and me. They contain the Word of the Lord as He gives it to us. It is our responsibility before the Lord to give you what He wants you to have. We cannot hold back or censor it in order to make it more mainstream and “normal.” 139. We’re not just your shepherds and the leaders and pastors of our religious movement; we’re prophets, as are you! And if God’s message is unconventional, well, God’s prophets have always been known for their radical, outlandish, strange, unconventional messages and deeds, and have often been ridiculed for them. 140. Look at Noah. He spent more than 100 years building the ark, preaching that God was going to destroy the world by a great flood, and only his wife, sons, and their wives believed him. But he was right! 141. Look at Abraham. God told him to leave his family and friends and go he knew not where, to some land someplace that God would somehow give him. Then when he got there, God told him that he’d have a son when he was 100 years old--and not only that, but when the son arrived, God told him to take him up on Mount Moriah and kill him! But Abraham believed God and obeyed, and came to be known as the father of faith because of his trust in God despite His unusual orders. 142. Look at Moses. He fled Egypt, no doubt wanted for murder, and spent 40 years in the desert just tending sheep. Then when God sent him back to confront Pharaoh, he preached and prophesied that God was going to deliver the Hebrews from the world empire of the day, Egypt, totally by faith! He had no armies, and he was so poor at communicating that his brother Aaron had to talk for him! 143. Look at Joshua. He was crazy enough to believe that he could send his men marching around the walls of Jericho, blowing their horns, and the walls would fall down. But his men believed him, and God fulfilled His promise. 144. Look at Gideon. God told him that he could defeat an army of 120,000 Midianites with just 300 men--and he was so confident of victory that he sent 32,000 men home who had doubts about it, just leaving the ones who were fully convinced along with him. And he did it, starting with trumpets, torches, and clay pots. 145. Look at Samson, Elijah and Elisha, with their outlandish message and acts, at Samuel, and at King David of old. And look at the prophets that followed them: Isaiah was told to go naked for three years as a testimony of how God was going to strip Israel. Ezekiel was told to spend a year lying on his side in front of a model of Jerusalem and eat cakes baked with dung as a testimony. Hosea was told to marry a prostitute to demonstrate the Lord’s love for Israel. 146. And if you want a prophet with an unusual message, look at Jesus! We’re very familiar with His Words and message today, but think how radical it must have been back then--and still is: “Ye cannot serve God and mammon” (Mat.6:24). “Take no thought for your life, what ye shall eat, or what ye shall drink; nor yet for your body, what ye shall put on. Is not the life more than meat and the body than raiment?” (Mat.6:25). “Follow Me, and let the dead bury their dead” (Mat.8:22). “Think not that I am come to send peace on earth; I came not to send peace, but a sword. For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law” (Mat.10:34-35). “He that is not with Me is against Me, and he that gathereth not with Me scattereth abroad” (Mat.12:30). 147. “If thy hand offend thee, cut it off. If thy foot offend thee, cut it off. If thine eye offend thee, pluck it out” (Mark 9:43,45,47). “My mother and My brethren are these which hear the Word of God, and do it” (Luk.8:21). “Whosoever will save his life shall lose it; but whosoever will lose his life for My sake, the same shall save it” (Luk.9:24). “If any man come to Me and hate not his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be My disciple. Whosoever he be of you that forsaketh not all that he hath, he cannot be My disciple” (Luk.14:26, 33). “They which shall be accounted worthy to obtain that world, and the resurrection from the dead, neither marry nor are given in marriage” (Luk.20:35). 148. “Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink His blood, ye have no life in you” (John 6:53). “The time cometh that whosoever killeth you will think that he doeth God service” (John 16:2). “Whose soever sins ye remit, they are remitted unto them; and whose soever sins ye retain, they are retained” (John 20:23). 149. So if all the prophets have preached and practiced a radical message, and the Son of God did so as well, why should people think it odd that we do too?

150. ACCUSATION: The prophecies in the GNs are edited or compiled to put a certain “slant” on what the Lord said. Mama disregards prophecies on the other side, and only publishes the prophecies that confirm what she wants to say. Thus she uses prophecy to “control” the Family by giving her views or desires more credibility or weight by having the counsel be from the Lord, in prophecy, when in actuality it’s only saying what Mama wants it to say. She manipulates and coerces people through prophecy.

151. (Peter:) Dad often called Mama “the insatiable woman.” Since marrying her and hearing from the Lord frequently with her, I understand more fully how true that statement is! Mama can never get enough of the Lord’s Words! She asks question after question, from all different angles, because she wants the full picture. Often she’ll have several people pray about the same question, or at least different aspects of it, just to make sure that the answer is well rounded. And when she’s going over one of our publications or working on a GN, or even going over prophecies that are for individuals, she almost never takes anything out or wants to narrow the subject, unless it’s so broad and general that it’s difficult to apply. She always wants to enlarge it, to get something on the other aspects that aren’t yet covered, to ask the Lord about the other side, to confirm with the Lord that this is really the message He wants to give and the tone He wants to give it in. She goes to great lengths to make sure she’s not missing something. 152. Dad was a real extremist at times. The Lord often used that side of his nature to get us moving as a Family. Mama’s part of their teamwork was always to bring up the other side. She was usually the one asking about other situations and how they would be affected, or giving the benefit of the doubt. And it’s still the same with her teamworking with the Lord. Rather than trying to slant prophecies in one direction or another, she’s always asking the Lord more questions, because if there’s another side, or more well-rounded counsel to be had, she wants it, and she wants to give it to you! She’s desperate not to misrepresent the Lord or His message in any way. 153. There are times when she does ask the Lord to talk on a specific topic. For example, “Let’s ask Dad to give us his views about such-and-such. We really need a message for the Family about that, because we’ve been having these problems.…” But even when she asks a question that seems to be coming from a certain angle, she’s open to whatever the Lord gives, and she encourages those who are hearing from the Lord to be open as well. And then once she receives that one message, it doesn’t stop there. She goes on to ask about the other sides and what further things He would have to say, or if there’s anything that’s missing, that’s needed to make the message more complete. She also gets confirmation after confirmation on the general direction. 154. Whenever there is a GN that contains major direction or changes, Mama and I have talked about it extensively and prayed about it repeatedly. We also counsel with the CROs on such matters, and they are not “yes men” who don’t have opinions. They comment on aspects that would affect their field, and they bring up any potential problems they see. 155. You can rest assured, dear Family, that by the time you receive a GN, Mama has asked the Lord many, many questions concerning its content, and it has been prayed about by several of her channels, from many different angles, and it has been counseled about. Even after she’s prepared a GN and is happy with it, it goes to proofreaders in WS who are then free to bring up any questions that they have, and each of those questions is prayed about as well. And if at any time in the process of preparing a GN for you the Lord makes reference to an exception, to another side of the story, or brings out something that would make the counsel more well rounded, she always wants to include it, and often will make last-minute additions if that’s when they come up, just because she doesn’t want to miss anything--and she doesn’t want you to miss anything either! 156. Of course, the crux of this question comes down to faith and belief in the Word--and that is something that’s in your court to pray about. I’m very sorry to hear that any of you would feel that the prophecies are slanted or manipulated, because if you aren’t able to have faith in the Word that the Lord is pouring out through Mama and me, it would understandably make it very difficult to implement it or move forward with the way the Lord is directing the Family. 157. Our faith in the Word--and in the Lord’s anointing on Mama as His appointed winetaster--is one of our basic fundamental beliefs. I don’t condemn those of you who have had battles over whether Mama is really getting it right, but it’s important that you see such a battle for what it is--a serious attack of the Enemy, trying to get you to doubt the Lord’s Words and destroy the faith that you place in them. 158. Believing in the Word is essential to a healthy spiritual life, so when you’re battling doubts it’s not something that you can take lightly. I’m glad we can cover this question in the GNs so that those of you who are sincerely wondering can know--albeit by faith--how Mama operates. But beyond that, it’s your choice as to what you choose to believe. However, if you can’t accept Mama’s role as the Lord’s anointed prophetess to lead the Family, then please ask the Lord to help you, because with this attitude you won’t have the faith in the Word that you need to have. You won’t be able to go with full faith in the direction that the Lord is moving the Family because you’ll always be wondering whether it’s really the right way to go. 159. If you feel that Mama isn’t giving you “the full scoop” in the GNs, or is holding something back or trying to manipulate things to go the way she wants them to go rather than the way the Lord is leading, ask the Lord for a confirmation of His leading. Otherwise when a new GN comes out, the Word won’t have the effect in your life that it should have--the effect of giving you life, strength, resistance to the Enemy’s attacks, etc. 160. Please pray about this and take it seriously. See it for the attack of the Enemy that it is, and go on the attack to have prayer against it, and then don’t entertain his thoughts and lies. He’ll make them sound very reasonable, but they’re half-truths whose sole purpose is to destroy your faith--which is your only shield against him. Don’t try to counter them with carnally minded logic. The only weapons that are effective against this sort of attack are the spiritual ones--the Word, prayer, praise, having united prayer, and hearing from the Lord yourself. (For more on this, read “Crisis of Faith,” ML #3088-90, Lifelines 23, and “Believing Prophecy,” ML #3130, Lifelines 24.)

161. ACCUSATION: If Mama doesn’t slant the prophecies to suit her own whims, then what about the stories we’ve heard about important revelations being changed during the production stage when people complained about them or voiced contrary opinions? Were the revelations wrong to start with? Mama is God’s mouthpiece and winetaster, but that still wouldn’t seem to give her the right to change God’s Word. Furthermore, why didn’t she get it right in the first place?

162. (Peter:) As I explained above, each GN goes through a particular process. After Mama and I work on it, it is read by a number of proofreaders, who we call “locals” (short for local proofreaders). This is usually about 25 people of all ages, ministries, and varying nationalities. Those people comment in writing about anything that in their opinion is unclear, that would reveal our location, that raises questions in their minds or that they feel people on the field will have questions about or would like a clarification on, etc. 163. The locals are quite outspoken people, and we’re happy that they are. If we just wanted a bunch of “yes men,” we wouldn’t bother with locals in the first place. They can really let it rip, so Mama is very used to having people critique the GNs. Usually it’s constructive criticism--although at times people have gotten rather emotional and riled up and have expressed themselves in a heated manner if something didn’t seem right to them. Mama doesn’t mind hearing people’s opinions, even when the presentation is not the best. She doesn’t take it personally. I doubt very many people could take the amount of feedback that she gets on something they’re working on; most people are much too sensitive. Mama appreciates people’s honesty and seriously considers every single suggestion or comment, and has someone ask the Lord about it. I mean this literally. She prayerfully thinks about and prays about every single suggestion. 164. Granted, she doesn’t always agree with each person’s point of view. Sometimes people say, “This is too heavy! This will blow away the young people! People will overreact; you shouldn’t get it out.” But if after serious consideration, counsel, and seeking the Lord she still believes it’s the Lord’s will, then she publishes it. She is determined, as was Dad, to not withhold the Word from you. Getting out the Word is her primary responsibility. 165. Regarding the GNs that are the most controversial or that will bring about the greatest changes in the Family, Mama seeks the counsel of not only our local proofreaders, but also of all the CROs. She does this because she is wise enough to know that there are thousands of different circumstances in the Family. After all, there are various age groups and countless different cultures and situations. She doesn’t presume to understand every aspect of field life and exactly how people in all situations will be affected, so she counsels, which is wisdom. 166. Then she pores over each and every suggestion from the CROs. Yes, changes are made based on their comments. But instead of seeing this as some kind of weakness or fault, you should see this as an act of love. She does that for you. It makes her job much, much more difficult and time-consuming, but she wants the Word that’s published, especially major revelations or pushes that will affect your lives greatly, to be the best it can be, with as many aspects covered and questions answered as possible. She doesn’t want to make it difficult for you or for you to get off track or mixed up because some important point that she didn’t think of was not addressed. She firmly believes that “in the multitude of counselors there is safety” (Pro. 11:14). She knows when she has received the Word of the Lord, but she also knows that there is a huge variety of ways that Word can be presented and applied, and that’s where she needs the counsel of others. 167. Some GNs about major revelations or moves of the Spirit had some changes made in them as a result of people’s reservations. Let’s take the “Loving Jesus” revelation. Some people are spreading the word that the original version implied that anyone who didn’t practice it was yielded to the Devil! Ha! That’s not true! Of course, there were many additions made to the “Loving Jesus” series as a result of people’s questions. There were also some deletions made, because the Lord indicated that some phraseology or illustrations were unnecessary and would cause it to be more difficult for you to receive it. Lots of clarifications about the man being a woman in spirit were added. It was made clear in the finalized GNs that the Loving Jesus revelation was not a fundamental Family belief. 168. Anyone would agree that it’s wiser to present such a radical revelation in the most palatable way possible, right? Why would anyone think that is a bad thing? Why would you criticize Mama for listening to the comments of those who really had a hard time with the original presentation and trying to adjust the presentation to make it easier for you? Most of the parts that were “too meaty” for the original introduction of the revelation were subsequently published over the next years. Obviously that was a wise plan, since you then had a chance to get used to it little by little. 169. The “Loving Jesus” revelation itself was not changed as a result of people’s suggestions or even complaints; it remained intact. But many additions were made as questions were answered; hence, the length of the series. But just because there were some changes made--additions, clarifications and deletions to make it easier for the Family to receive--that certainly doesn’t make it a false prophecy or revelation. Anyone who has that idea certainly doesn’t know much about prophecy and has a very narrow concept of the Lord’s way of teamworking with us. As you’ll see once the full series of “Understanding Prophecy” is published, the Lord expects us to keep coming back to Him and getting more from Him each time there is a question or needed clarification. This isn’t tampering with prophecy; this is wisdom! 170. There were some very adamant cries from some of our co-workers at the time we were receiving the “Loving Jesus” revelation who pleaded with Mama and me to not publish it. They said it would destroy the Family. They threatened to leave. But that’s where we drew the line. Answering questions and making adjustments to help people to receive the truth is one thing, but not publishing the truth is another thing altogether! We knew God had given that message and He wanted you to benefit from it. That is where Mama and I must obey God rather than man! 171. We are determined to publish the Word as the Lord gives it. And for those of you who are now comfortable with loving the Lord intimately, aren’t you happy we did? Those of you who regularly practice the “Loving Jesus” revelation have probably reached a place in your lives by now where it feels quite natural and comfortable. That’s how it is with those in our Home. It’s like, “What’s the big deal?” So you say mild love words to the Lord when praising Him unitedly; you listen to the Loving Jesus tapes, which by the way are favorites now in the Family; you say love words of whatever level of eroticism you feel comfortable with in your private times of praise, and you say whatever you feel led to say when having sex, either alone or with a partner. It becomes a normal part of life and not the big bugaboo that our detractors would like to make it out to be. You have also witnessed the rewards and blessings of loving the Lord in this way. The “Loving Jesus” revelation is our firmly held religious belief, and is a private matter! (By the way, no one that we know of has been reclassified or threatened with reclassification on the grounds of not believing or practicing the “Loving Jesus” revelation, as it’s not a fundamental Family belief. In fact, we have made it clear repeatedly that believing in this revelation is not required to retain your CM membership.) 172. Some are worried about our security because we published an edited, but still quite detailed, version of the “Loving Jesus” GNs for junior teens. We prayed about this desperately, seeking the Lord repeatedly. The reason the Lord led us to publish this was because this series was being read during the Family Birthday Feast and we wanted to preempt the junior teens finding out about the revelation from their older brothers and sisters. Some say the reading of this was a stumbling block for junior teens, but the Lord indicated that this was the safer way for them to be informed. Because had they heard about it in an exaggerated, gossipy, or even mocking way from their peers, it would have been very confusing. As far as the sexual aspect, junior teens vary in their interest in sex and their personal experience, but it’s pretty safe to say that most 14- and 15-year-olds masturbate or at least know about masturbation. Since we don’t consider masturbation a sin and it’s not encouraging them to perform a sex act with another person, there’s no reason to be so secretive about it. 173. The rating on the junior teen version of the “Loving Jesus” series is changed, however, so that it can be read with them at the discretion of you parents, and you can make that decision yourselves. At this point in time your junior teens probably aren’t even thinking about the Loving Jesus revelation, so of course they’re not as eager to get the full scoop from their older brothers and sisters about it. The circumstances today are much different than they were during the Feast when the revelation was being introduced, which of course drew a lot of attention to it.

• * *

174. Okay, on to a different subject: There have been rumors circulating about the “marriage of the generations,” that it was canned as a result of complaints from the CROs. This refers to a move of the Spirit that some of you are aware of, as it was introduced during Summit ‘96. This was a move to bring the two generations together--a move which was very much of the Lord and which is still in progress. 175. It’s true that at one point Mama was considering presenting the “marriage of the generations” at the Family Birthday Feast of 1998. The CROs read the GNs, as they often do with the Feast material or when it’s a controversial matter. Some raised their concerns that the term “marriage of the generations” would be misinterpreted; that was a problem. Others said the Family was not ready for this, that there were not enough safeguards in place and that there was the possibility that young SGA women would feel pressured to have sex with FGA men. 176. After hearing from the CROs and praying further, it was obvious that the Family was not ready for the “marriage of the generations.” It is true that there were not enough safeguards in place, and there was not enough understanding of the Law of Love. There was no threat from the CROs that the Family would fall apart if this move of the Spirit were to be published, but there was concern for the happiness of the younger generation, the young women in particular. Some very significant changes were made in the GNs primarily to protect the young women from feeling undue pressure to have sex with older men, and to prevent problems in marriages as a result of runaway outside relationships. 177. Also, as we continued to pray about it, the Lord made it immensely clear that the “marriage of the generations” was much more than sexual sharing. Sexual sharing was just a tiny part of it, but that tiny part had potential to be exaggerated, misinterpreted, and abused. The “marriage of the generations” was in essence supposed to be a unity of heart and spirit, which comes from mutual respect and working together, just as we have in our Home. To make sure that that was the primary emphasis, rather than a sexual focus, the presentation of the need for unity between the generations was changed. The term “marriage of the generations” was not used, but instead the Lord showed us to use the term “the uniting of the generations,” which is much less “sexual” sounding. This was a small but important change. Other changes were made as well. 178. Was this a bad thing to not promote the “marriage of the generations” in the Family Birthday Feast of 1998? Is there something so horrible about changing the presentation of the Lord’s direction to avoid misunderstandings and to protect people from being hurt? Certainly not! 179. Some of the same people who accuse us of not being sensitive enough to foresee possible problems with the Law of Love and change our Letters accordingly now accuse us for doing this very thing! First they attack us for not setting more safeguards to protect our young people, and then they attack us for doing so. 180. We do not have plans to publish any GNs on the “marriage of the generations” because this is already happening naturally. With the publication of the GNs on unity and the Law of Love series, and the new series on uniting the generations, the two generations are becoming closer in spirit, with fewer barriers, which is the main “marriage” that the Lord wanted to see come to pass. (See ML #3092:118-120; #3095:20-22, 25-36; Lifelines 23.) 181. It is happening gently, and within the guidelines and boundaries that have been established and articulated in the Law of Love GN series, which include: not pressuring anyone to share sexually; that all sexual sharing by married partners be done in counsel with and consideration for their mate; that responsibility will be taken by the man in the event of pregnancy, etc. (See “Overcoming the Generation Gap,” ML #3161, Lifelines 24; “Golden Victories,” ML #3162, Lifelines 25; The “Law of Love” series, MLs #3201-3211, Lifelines 25; “Self-Righteousness--The Great Barrier to Uniting the Generations,” ML #3293, GN 897.) 182. Mama is not perfect, neither does she claim to be perfect. She knows this and she knows that just as the Lord has put all of you in teamworks, she needs a teamwork as well. This is the Lord’s plan for all of us, that we work in teamwork and with the counsel of others. 183. Of all the people I know in the Family, I would say that Mama accepts her need for teamworking and help from others the most. She is open to the most counsel from the most people, and she considers listening to others to be part of her God-given responsibility. 184. She does not claim that the GNs are perfectly well rounded and accurate after she has worked on them and before she has counseled with others about them. It is only after the Lord has used her big teamwork of the locals proofreaders, as well as any others who need to be consulted and counseled with, and only after everything has been prayed about and re-prayed about when necessary, that she feels that the GNs are exactly the way the Lord wants them to be for your instruction and edification. 185. When a GN is sent to you, after the Lord’s confirmation that it is ready to go out, then you can consider it as well rounded and accurate and as “perfect” as the Lord knows is needed at the time. Before a GN is sent out to the Family, however, it is still in the “draft” stage and the Lord and Mama expect that it will go through changes. There is safety in the multitude of counselors. The Lord doesn’t allow any of us to be sufficient in ourselves--even Mama. He makes it necessary for her to have counselors too. 186. Counseling is a way of life for Mama and me, and we wouldn’t think of making decisions on our own. Even when we have a pretty good idea we’re right and we go to the Lord for His confirmation, we still discuss and check major decisions with our counselors. This is true not only in our work on the GNs, but also regarding any decisions that affect the Family, our Home, our co-workers, the leadership of the Family, etc.

187. ACCUSATION: By encouraging the Family to live the Law of Love, including more sexual sharing, the Family is again fomenting an over-sexualized atmosphere where the children will once again be in danger of improper behavior on the part of adults.

188. (Peter:) The Law of Love GN series was not published to promote wild, irresponsible sex. It was published, in large part, to promote unity, which is the goal of sexual sharing within our Homes, as well as to address some very needed subjects, such as: young women getting pregnant and the men not taking responsibility, minimum responsibility of the father of a child, guidelines for relationships when one of the people involved is already married, understanding and overcoming jealousy, making sure adequate attention was given FGA women, and living the One Wife vision so people who are lonely, like single mothers, can receive the love and help they need. The subject of sacrificial sharing was touched on, but very lightly, and that is certainly not the main focus. This series was really very practical and tedious, and hardly a “hot” sex document promoting wild orgies or telling the Family you have to be “spending a lot more time having sex, whether you feel like it or not.” 189. The circumstances that exist today in our Homes regarding practicing the sexual aspect of the Law of Love are very different than they were years ago before the Charter. With the publishing of the Law of Love series and the many new Charter rules that govern our sexual sharing, there are many safeguards. There is much less chance of people going off the deep end in any way. 190. If you see any inappropriate activity or interaction between people of any age, you are responsible to report it. There are rules and consequences for breaking those rules.

191. ACCUSATION: Mama and Peter don’t listen to people. They’re closed-minded. They’re determined to have their own way no matter what.

192. (Peter:) It’s interesting how the same people who accuse us of wrongdoing because we prayerfully consider people’s comments and opinions, and make adjustments in the presentation of the Word and the counsel for the Family in the GNs, also accuse us of being closed-minded and not listening to people. As the leader, you have to make the final decision. When you listen to people and change your position to agree with their views, they’re happy. When you listen to people and don’t change your position, they’re not happy. But the point that bugs them is not that you don’t listen, which is what detractors would have you believe; it’s that you didn’t agree with their point of view. That’s what makes them mad. No matter how much courtesy you show and no matter how much you seriously consider someone’s views and pray about them and try to accommodate them, if, in the end, your final decision is different than that person’s views, they often get mad and hold a grudge, but their excuse is, “They don’t listen.” 193. As I explained above, Mama and I listen to others and seek counsel as much as we can. Besides the thousands and thousands of communications that we receive each year from CROs, VSs, and individuals in the Family, we also are aware of many of the comments and suggestions that you write in on your TRFs. We also hold a Summit approximately every two years during which the major Family problems are discussed with the CROs and prayed about. 194. Between listening to the Lord, the CROs and VSs, and you via my visits to the field and the many letters, e-mails, comments and suggestions that Mama and I receive from you, we spend most of our time listening! We not only listen, but we make changes based on what we hear and what you write us. That’s why you’ve received the Charter and a multitude of new Letters over the past five years, including the new “Action Series.” We value your counsel and communications and take action based on them.

195. ACCUSATION: Mama and Peter treat people badly, especially those who are not totally loyal and “on board.” They’re abusive, controlling, manipulative, self-centered, deceitful and callous leaders who are willing to do just about anything to save their reputations and preserve their image.

196. (Mama:) I have heard that some former members feel that way about Peter and me. I know it’s difficult for you, dear Family, when you hear people talk about us who supposedly know us so well and who have worked with us closely. It’s extremely confusing when people who have been in WS tell you stories that make us look like monsters, like terribly selfish, uncaring, manipulative, self-serving people who think only of ourselves. These stories are presented in detail, with “she/he said this” or “she/he did that” and they seem so believable. 197. The only thing I can say is that such stories usually represent complex situations in which one tiny moment of interaction or one minute shred of a conversation might be presented, which twists the truth. Anyone who has been in the Family for any length of time knows that working with people and helping people through their problems is a complicated process. Peter and I have tried to be as loving and kind as possible with those in our Home and in WS. If we have sent or given people prophecies from the Lord or Dad, we have done so in combination with personal shepherding when possible. We have been very patient, and have given people much time to overcome their bitternesses and spiritual problems. We don’t just lop people off and tell them (through prophecy or otherwise) that they’re full of the Devil, or threaten to send them away or separate them from their families. I love and appreciate the people I work with. I love David and Techi as a mother and Trevor as a grandmother. I love and respect the young people who have chosen to make the sacrifice to live behind the scenes. Probably some people would try to tell you differently. 198. It’s a strange thing how two people can remember a situation so differently, isn’t it? I know our detractors write these outlandish accounts and they are so sure they’re right. They scream, “I was there! This is how it was!” But there is often so much more to the story that, if it were known and told, would portray us and all involved very differently. 199. Another particularly convincing method of those who are disgruntled and unhappy with the Family or some aspect of the Word, leadership, or our life is when they latch onto some event that took place and give it their own particular interpretation, saying it was wrong. Then they use that example to validate their argument that “because this is wrong, everything else must be wrong too.” 200. Peter and I cannot possibly refute every story that’s told about how supposedly horrible and mean and cruel we are, just as Dad couldn’t. We’re too busy trying to fulfill the Lord’s commission to feed the sheep to spend our time writing volumes explaining the real story of every situation that our detractors bring up. We’ll let the works that we do bear witness of us, as the Lord told His detractors (John 5:36). 201. It’s like the story of the man who helped build the Panama Canal: While contending with the manifold problems of geography and climate in the building of the Panama Canal, Colonel George Washington Goethals had to endure the carping criticism of countless busybodies back home who freely predicted that he would never complete his great task. But the resolute builder pressed steadily forward in his work, and said nothing. “Aren’t you going to answer your critics?” a subordinate inquired. “In time,” Goethals replied. “How?” The great engineer smiled. “With the canal,” he replied. (See Good Thots 1, page 757, #25.)

202. We don’t have time to refute every story told about us, but we can remind you of the scripture, “Because they received not the love of the truth, God will send them strong delusion that they should believe a lie” (2Thes.2:10-11). Some of these stories are history rewritten, but these former members really believe what they write. That is one reason why they can sound so sincere and convincing and make you feel sorry for them as the poor victims. But remember, just because they say something happened doesn’t necessarily make it so! 203. You might wonder how someone can be loyal and true for a long time in the Family and then have a huge change of heart and become very negative, bitter and vindictive. Such changes of heart and mindset start off gradually and slowly. It doesn’t happen overnight with just one big thing that the person finds hard to accept, and because of that one big thing makes the decision to leave behind the life they once loved. But once they do, then little by little they forget or choose to block out the things they used to cherish--the years of faithful service, all the times that the Lord and the Family provided and cared for them, all the blessings of Family life, the joy, fulfillment and challenge of full-time missionary service. 204. Sadly, these people have been weakened in spirit by having allowed an infiltration of the Enemy’s lies into their mind, a slow and constant dripping away at their convictions with a steady stream of his doubts and lies about this and that. 205. The person who is weakening in heart and spirit might not even notice it. It might not seem like a big deal at first; it’s just a little negative thinking, a little entertaining of some bitterness or resentment. But the problem comes when such thoughts of the Enemy become a habit, a regular part of their mindset and thought pattern. 206. When someone entertains and accepts thoughts of resentment, bitterness, doubt, and the lies of the Enem