<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.xfamily.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=HomeARC_ML_0647</id>
	<title>HomeARC ML 0647 - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.xfamily.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=HomeARC_ML_0647"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.xfamily.org/index.php?title=HomeARC_ML_0647&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-11-11T13:34:30Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.11</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.xfamily.org/index.php?title=HomeARC_ML_0647&amp;diff=14905&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Bot: recategorize</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.xfamily.org/index.php?title=HomeARC_ML_0647&amp;diff=14905&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2006-07-27T02:26:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;recategorize&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122;&quot; data-mw=&quot;interface&quot;&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-content&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-content&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;tr class=&quot;diff-title&quot; lang=&quot;en&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;← Older revision&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;Revision as of 02:26, 27 July 2006&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot; id=&quot;mw-diff-left-l83&quot;&gt;Line 83:&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot;&gt;Line 83:&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;[[Category:HomeARC]]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;[[Category:HomeARC &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;ML 0601-800&lt;/ins&gt;]]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;

&lt;!-- diff cache key xfwikistaging:diff:1.41:old-11692:rev-14905:php=table --&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Bot</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.xfamily.org/index.php?title=HomeARC_ML_0647&amp;diff=11692&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Bot: testing bot</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.xfamily.org/index.php?title=HomeARC_ML_0647&amp;diff=11692&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2006-07-26T04:36:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;testing bot&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{disclaimer-family}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;padding: 1em; margin: 10px; border: 2px dotted green;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;quot;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;LOVE VS. LAW!&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;quot;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;--By Moses David        July 23, 1977        GP        NO.647&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;        Copyrighted Jan. 1978 by the Children of God&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       1.&amp;#039;&amp;#039; &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;FIRST OF ALL, WE KNOW THAT ALL MOSAIC LAWS ARE NULL AND VOID&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; &amp;#039;&amp;#039;as far as &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;we&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; are concerned. &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Christ&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; was the &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;end&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; of the &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;law&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;, He &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;fulfilled&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; the law, and from then on we were no longer under the law. And as Paul taught time and time again all through his epistles, they were no longer under the &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;law&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; but now under God&amp;#039;s &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;grace&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;, God&amp;#039;s &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Love&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;.--&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Jesus&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;!&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       2. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;EVERYTIME THAT CHRIST HIMSELF QUOTED THE LAW HE WAS ILLUSTRATING A POINT&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; for a particular purpose, just like we sometimes expose people with their own arguments when they contradict them themselves. He said, &amp;quot;Ye have heard that it was said,&amp;quot; quoting the Mosaic law, &amp;quot;thou shalt not commit adultery,&amp;quot; but &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; say unto you:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       3. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;quot;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;WHOSOEVER LOOKETH ON A WOMAN TO LUST AFTER HER HATH COMMITTED ADULTERY WITH HER ALREADY&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; in his heart.&amp;quot; (Mt.5:27.28.) Now what man on God&amp;#039;s Earth can possibly look upon a beautiful woman, no matter &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;who&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; she is, without lusting after her? Nobody! Nobody&amp;#039;s that saintly, nobody&amp;#039;s that good, and Jesus knew it!&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       4.&amp;#039;&amp;#039; &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;HE WAS QUOTING THAT SCRIPTURE TO PROVE TO THE SELF-RIGHTEOUS HYPOCRITICAL SCRIBES AND PHARISEES THAT NOT EVEN THEY COULD POSSIBLY KEEP THE LAW&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;!&amp;#039;&amp;#039; He was proving that it was impossible for &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;any&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; man on God&amp;#039;s Earth to ever keep the &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Mosaic&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; law, and that&amp;#039;s why it was given, to show the righteousness of &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;God,&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; the &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;perfection&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; of God.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       5. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR ANYONE TO BE GOOD ACCORDING TO THE MOSAIC LAW&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;!&amp;#039;&amp;#039; The Mosaic Law makes &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;every one&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; of us a &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;sinner&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; because not &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;one&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; of us can keep it! Nobody has &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;ever&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; kept the Ten Commandments except &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Jesus Himself&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;nobody&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;! It&amp;#039;s impossible!&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       6. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;THAT&amp;#039;S WHY JESUS HAD TO DIE FOR US, SO THAT WE COULD BE FORGIVEN AND BE SAVED&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; by His &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;grace&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; and His &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;mercy&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; and His &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;love without&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; the law! By the &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;law&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; we are &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;judged&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; for our sins and &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;condemned&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; to die and to suffer. But Jesus came to &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;save&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; us by &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;love&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;, by His &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;mercy&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;, showing that &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;love&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;mercy&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; are &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;greater&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; than the law, and He says so! (Jn.1:17, Gal.5:14, Tit.3:5.)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       7.&amp;#039;&amp;#039; &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;HIS ENEMIES, THE SELF-RIGHTEOUS HYPOCRITES, KEPT TRYING TO ACCUSE HIM&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; and trick Him and trap Him in some little technical violation of the law. He said, &amp;quot;I&amp;#039;ll tell you what you need to learn, you need to learn what &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;mercy&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; is,&amp;quot; in other words, what &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;love&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; is. (Mt. 9:13)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       8. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;HE SAID YOU NEED TO GO BACK AND LEARN WHAT GOD MEANT WHEN HE SAID, &amp;quot;I WILL HAVE MERCY AND NOT SACRIFICE&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;.&amp;quot;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (Mt.9:13, 12:7.) In other words, I would rather see you have &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;love&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; and not this sacrificial dutiful &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;law&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;-keeping offering of sacrifices and duties, I&amp;#039;d rather you&amp;#039;d give &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;love&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; to somebody than to just be so &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;self-righteous&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       9. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;I HAVE HEARD PREACHERS SAY &amp;quot;AHA! YOU SEE? YOU&amp;#039;RE A NAUGHTY BOY IF YOU LOOK UPON A WOMAN TO LUST AFTER HER&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;.&amp;quot;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Well, I can hardly remember any woman I ever looked at when I was a kid that I &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;didn&amp;#039;t&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; lust after! I used to sit there on the church bench and look at the pianist&amp;#039;s behind while she was playing and think how beautiful it was and how wonderful if I could get ahold of it, and I&amp;#039;d almost get hard just watching it!&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       10. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;IT&amp;#039;S IMPOSSIBLE FOR ANY MAN TO KEEP SUCH A LAW&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; because &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;no&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; man is that good! &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;No&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; man is that perfect, &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;no&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; man is that sinless that he can even look upon a beautiful woman without lusting after her, no matter &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;whose&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; wife she is, nobody, nobody!&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       11.&amp;#039;&amp;#039; &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;SO JESUS WAS TRYING TO PROVE THAT IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR MAN TO KEEP THE MOSAIC LAWS&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;,&amp;#039;&amp;#039; and that therefore since it&amp;#039;s &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;impossible&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; for us to keep &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;God&amp;#039;s&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; laws, then how could we be &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;saved&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;? Well, we have to be saved by &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;love&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;mercy&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; by &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;grace&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       12. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;THIS IS WHY HE SAID THAT HE WAS THE FULFILMENT OF THE LAW, HE WAS THE END OF THE LAW&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;,&amp;#039;&amp;#039; and that after Him there was &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;no more law&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;. (Mt.5:17, Ro.10:4.) Paul brings this out time and time again, this is what nearly all of Paul&amp;#039;s whole writing is about in his epistles: Anti-works, anti-law, and pro-grace, pro-love.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       13. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;ANOTHER TIME THAT JESUS SPOKE ABOUT ADULTERY HE SAID THAT MOSES SAID THAT YOU COULD DIVORCE&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; your wife and marry another. Then He said, &amp;quot;But &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; say unto you, That whosoever shall &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;put away&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; his wife&amp;quot;--now that&amp;#039;s talking about &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;divorce&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;, showing the horrible heinous sin of divorce. He is not talking abut &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;adultery&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; being such a great sin, He is talking about &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;divorce&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; being the &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;greater&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; sin.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       14.&amp;#039;&amp;#039; &amp;quot;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;WHOSOEVER SHALL PUT AWAY HIS WIFE, AND SHALL MARRY ANOTHER, COMMITTETH ADULTERY&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;.&amp;quot;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (Mt.5:32,19:9) It doesn&amp;#039;t even say that the other woman was somebody else&amp;#039;s wife, she could have been single, but if you &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;put away&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; your wife, in other words you &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;divorce&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; her, and you marry somebody else, you&amp;#039;re committing &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;adultery&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       15. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;OF COURSE THEY WERE ALWAYS THINKING THAT ADULTERY WAS ALMOST THE GREATEST SIN OF ALL&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;.&amp;#039;&amp;#039; They seemed to think it was a greater sin than murder, from the way the Scribes and the Pharisees handled it, probably because it was their biggest temptation!&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       16. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;HE WAS SAYING THAT YOU&amp;#039;RE JUST AS BAD AS AN ADULTERER IF YOU DIVORCE YOU WIFE&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;,&amp;#039;&amp;#039; because, He said, &amp;quot;it causeth &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;her&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; to commit adultery: and whosoever &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;marries&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; her that is divorced committeth adultery.&amp;quot; (Mt.5:32) In other words, you &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;forced&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; her to become the wife of some other man, which is a &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;lack&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; of &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;love&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; and in His eyes was &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;adultery&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;, you didn&amp;#039;t &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;love&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; her enough to &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;keep&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; her yourself and &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;love&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; her, but you &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;put&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; her away.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       17.&amp;#039;&amp;#039; &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;NOW IT DOES NOT SAY IT&amp;#039;S ADULTERY WHEN YOU KEEP THE WOMAN AS YOUR WIFE&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; and you continue to let her enjoy your name and your house and her status as your wife. But if you&amp;#039;ve thrown her out, you&amp;#039;ve &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;divorced&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; her, you&amp;#039;ve &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;put her away, this&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; way you make her an adulteress. Do you understand? (Mt.19:9)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       18. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;HE DOESN&amp;#039;T SAY YOU MAKE HER AN ADULTERESS BY LOANING HER TO SOMEBODY, BUT STILL HONOURING HER AND LOVING HER&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; and taking her back when she gets through. That&amp;#039;s not what He&amp;#039;s talking about at all. We&amp;#039;re not even in that class at all.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       19. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;IF YOU PUT AWAY YOUR WIFE, HE SAYS, THEN YOU&amp;#039;RE AN ADULTERER, THEN YOU MAKE HER AN ADULTERESS, AND THEN THE GUY WHO MARRIES HER IS AN ADULTERER&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;.&amp;#039;&amp;#039; If you &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;put away&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; your wife and she marries somebody else, &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;three&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; people are then guilty of adultery--the &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;husband&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;, the &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;wife&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; and the &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;guy&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; who marries her!&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       20.&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;MARIA: IF YOU PUT HER AWAY WHEN SHE DOESN&amp;#039;T WANT TO BE PUT AWAY.&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;)&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Exactly, if you put her away when &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;she&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; doesn&amp;#039;t &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;want&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; to be put away. I mean it&amp;#039;s an entirely different thing when they &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;depart&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;--&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;then&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; the Bible says a brother or sister&amp;#039;s &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;not&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; bound in &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;such&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; a case. (1Cor.7:15)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       21. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;IT SAYS IF THEY WANT TO DEPART, LET THEM DEPART, THEN YOU&amp;#039;RE NOT BOUND&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;,&amp;#039;&amp;#039; that&amp;#039;s a totally different thing. In other words, if your wife &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;wants&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; to leave you permanently and go off with some other man, doesn&amp;#039;t &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;want&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; to have anything to do with you anymore, doesn&amp;#039;t &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;want&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; to live with you anymore, doesn&amp;#039;t &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;want&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; to live in the same house with you anymore, doesn&amp;#039;t &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;want&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; to be your wife anymore, it says &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;let&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; her depart! That&amp;#039;s a totally different case. A brother or sister is &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;not&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; bound in such a case.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       22. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;SO THAT DOESN&amp;#039;T MAKE YOU AN ADULTERER IF SHE GOES OFF&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; &amp;#039;&amp;#039;and marries somebody else. &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;She&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; has made the choice and therefore &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;she&amp;#039;s&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; gone off with somebody else. Whether &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;she&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; is classified as an adulteress, since she&amp;#039;s the one who ran off with somebody else, is something that is not made clear.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       23. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;I&amp;#039;M INCLINED TO BELIEVE SHE IS PROBABLY GUILTY&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; because she &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;forsook&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; her husband. (Mk.10:12 and I Cor.07:10-11) If her husband &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;wants&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; to keep her and he&amp;#039;s &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;willing&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; to keep her but &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;she&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; runs off, then I would say she&amp;#039;d probably be classed as an adulteress and the guy she marries an adulterer. In this case she&amp;#039;s guilty of &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;desertion&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; and probably &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;adultery&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       24. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;HE IS TALKING ABOUT DIVORCE AS BEING A FAR GREATER SIN THAN ANY OTHER TYPE OF MARITAL OR SEXUAL SIN&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;.&amp;#039;&amp;#039; &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Divorce&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;, in other words, no longer &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;loving&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; your wife, no longer &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;caring&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; for her, no longer loving her, do you understand? (Mal.2:14-16)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       25. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;ANOTHER CASE THAT I REMEMBER IS WHEN THE WOMAN CAUGHT IN THE ACT OF ADULTERY WAS BROUGHT TO HIM&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (John 8) and they said, &amp;quot;Now Moses in the law commanded us that such should be stoned: but what sayest thou?&amp;quot; What did He say?--&amp;quot;Okay, let&amp;#039;s pick up stones boys and throw them at her!&amp;quot;--No! He said,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       26.&amp;#039;&amp;#039; &amp;quot;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;HE THAT IS WITHOUT SIN AMONG YOU, LET HIM FIRST CAST A STONE AT HER&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;quot;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;--and they &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;all&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; slunk away because they &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;all&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; knew they were sinners! They were probably lusting after her right that minute!&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       27. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;SO WHAT DID JESUS DO IN THE CASE OF THIS WOMAN? HE FORGAVE HER&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;,&amp;#039;&amp;#039; right? He showed great &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;mercy&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;. What did He do in the case of another &amp;quot;bad&amp;quot; woman who came and washed His feet with her tears and wiped them with her hair? What did He do? He &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;forgave&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; her, showed great &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;mercy&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;love&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;! (Luke 7:36:50)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       28.&amp;#039;&amp;#039; &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;WHAT DID HE DO WITH MARY MAGDALENE WHO WAS POSSESSED WITH SEVEN DEVILS, A VERY FAMOUS WHORE&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;,&amp;#039;&amp;#039; famous courtesan, a favorite of the heads of Rome and so on, the heads of State there in Jerusalem. What did He do with &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;her&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;? He cast out the seven devils, &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;forgave&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; her, and she had great &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;love&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; for Him. (Luke 8:2)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       29. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;I EVEN BELIEVE THAT HE LIVED WITH HER AND MARY AND MARTHA LATER&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;,&amp;#039;&amp;#039; which was no sin for Him, because He couldn&amp;#039;t commit sin. Everything that He did He did in &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;love&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;, He probably did it for their sakes as much as His own--He had physical needs just like they did.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       30. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;AND IT WAS NO SIN, WHY SHOULD IT BE SIN?&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; If it helped Him and it helped them and it showed His &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;love&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; for them and their &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;love&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; for Him, who could it offend? No one but the self righteous hypocritical Scribes and Pharisees, His critics and enemies! They&amp;#039;re the only ones it offended because they were trying to get something on Him.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       31. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;SO IN EVERY SUCH CASE AS THIS THE LORD WAS EXTREMELY MERCIFUL&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; for one thing, extremely &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;broad-minded&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; for another, and extremely &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;forgiving&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; and eventually He said that God&amp;#039;s &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;only&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; law was &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;love&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;. They asked Him &amp;quot;what&amp;quot; is the greatest commandment? He said, &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Love&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; the Lord thy God with all thy heart ... And thy neighbour as thyself.... On these hang &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;all&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; the law and the prophets.&amp;quot; (Mt.22:36-40)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       32. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;IN OTHER WORDS THERE IS NOW NO OTHER LAW BUT LOVE&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;. If it&amp;#039;s done in &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;love&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; and all parties concerned are &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;agreed&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; because they &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;love&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; each other, then there is &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;no sin&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;.-It is &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;love!&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       33. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;WHEN I GAVE HER TO OTHERS BECAUSE I LOVED THEM, THERE WAS NO SIN&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; whatsoever, I did it in pure sacrificial unselfish &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;love&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; for them, because I even loved &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;them&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;, in a sense, more than I loved &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;myself&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;!&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       34. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;I WAS CONCERNED ABOUT THEM AND THEIR NEED FOR LOVE&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; and I &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;wanted&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; her to love them because I knew they &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;needed&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; it. I &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;loved&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; them enough that I &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;wanted&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; her to make love to them.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       35. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;BUT I DELIBERATELY WILLFULLY, KNOWINGLY, DETERMINEDLY, MYSELF WILLINGLY GAVE HER TO THEM&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;,&amp;#039;&amp;#039; loaned her to them for a little while, that she might &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;love&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; them and &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;relieve&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; them and try to &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;save&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; them. This was no &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;sin&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; on my part, this was &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;love!&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       36. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;IT WAS CERTAINLY NO SIN ON HER PART&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;,&amp;#039;&amp;#039; she did it out of sacrificial love as well. Whether she did it in love for &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;me&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; or &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;both&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; of us, she did it in &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;love&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; so it&amp;#039;s &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;no sin&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;. I did it in totally unselfish pure sacrificial &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;love&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; and so did she!&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       37. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;IF ANYBODY WAS AT ALL SELFISH IT MIGHT HAVE BEEN THE POOR BABE&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; to whom she was given, especially if he didn&amp;#039;t understand it. But nevertheless he had the &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;need&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;, like a little baby, and he received what he needed. And as far as &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;he&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; was concerned, because &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; was willing and &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;she&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; was willing and we both did it in &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;love&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;, he took it by &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;faith&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;, and it was it was &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;no sin&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;!&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       38. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;IF HE RECEIVED IT BY FAITH HE ALSO HAS NO SIN BECAUSE HE IS RECEIVING LOVE AS A GIFT OF LOVE&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;.&amp;#039;&amp;#039; How could it be a sin for him to receive our &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;love&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;? We &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;both&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; willingly gave it, right? So it&amp;#039;s &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;no sin&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; for him. It was all done in &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;love&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;?&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       39. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;SO AS FAR AS WE&amp;#039;RE CONCERNED AND AS FAR AS THE BIBLE SAYS, FOR US THERE IS NO SUCH THING ANYMORE AS ADULTERY&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;!&amp;#039;&amp;#039; There is no such thing anymore as a Biblical law against adultery, as long as whatever is done is done in &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;love&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;, because the &amp;quot;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Law&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; of &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;love&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;quot; supersedes &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;all&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; other laws!&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       40. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;NOW, IF A WOMAN SELFISHLY FOR HER OWN LUSTFUL PURPOSES GOES AGAINST HER HUSBAND&amp;#039;S DESIRES&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; and against his will and hurts him by running off with another man or goes to bed with another man, that&amp;#039;s a totally different story!&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       41. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;I&amp;#039;M NOT TALKING ABOUT HIM BEING HURT BY SACRIFICIALLY LOVING&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;--&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Jesus got hurt on the cross, but He did it willingly and He did it of His own desire to save us. So it may have hurt me sometimes in a way because it was a sacrifice, but it was a sacrifice of &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;love&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       42. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;DAVID SAID, &amp;quot;I WILL NOT OFFER UNTO THE LORD OF THAT WHICH DOTH COST ME NOTHING&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;!&amp;quot;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (2Sam.24:24.) I&amp;#039;m not going to give the Lord something that doesn&amp;#039;t hurt me or is no sacrifice and costs me nothing. I&amp;#039;ve given the Lord of that which cost me a great deal!&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       43. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;SO IF THE HUSBAND HAS DONE IT WILLINGLY, AND HAS DONE IT IN LOVE&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;,&amp;#039;&amp;#039; even if it might hurt a little, then he will receive his reward because he did it in &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;love&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;. If the wife did it in love sacrificially, unselfishly in &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;love&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; for him, for another man, &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;she&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; will receive &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;her&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; reward, &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;she&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; did it in &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;love&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       44. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;IF THE MAN RECEIVED IT AS AN UNCOMPROMISING GIFT OF LOVE,&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; knowing that it was with &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;mutual&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; consent on the part of &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;both&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; the husband and the wife and they did it in &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;love&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; because they &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;love&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; him, he merely receives the &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;gift&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; of &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;love&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; and it is &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;no sin&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; on his part.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       45. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;BUT I DON&amp;#039;T THINK ANY HUSBAND WHO HAS A WIFE AVAILABLE AND WILLING TO SUPPLY HIS SEXUAL NEEDS, NEEDS OUR SEXUAL LOVE&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;.&amp;#039;&amp;#039; I have always been against supplying such husbands with sex if they &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;have&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; someone who can give them sex and who gives it willingly and lovingly and who satisfies this need.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       46. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;NOW IF SHE IS WITHHOLDING HERSELF OR GIVING BEGRUDGINGLY&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; &amp;#039;&amp;#039;and he gets no &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;real&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; love out of it, then she&amp;#039;s &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;not&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; satisfying his need for &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;love&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; by giving mere &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;sex&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;. If she&amp;#039;s giving it begrudgingly or resentfully or even with abjection and she doesn&amp;#039;t give it gladly, willingly, cheerfully and in &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;love&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;, then she is &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;not&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; supplying that need, and she is guilty of &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;denying&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; herself to that husband and &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;she herself&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; is causing him to seek it elsewhere.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       47. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;SO HE IS NOT THE GUILTY PARTY, SHE IS THE GUILTY ONE&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; for &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;not&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; giving that man his &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;due,&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; right? The Scripture explicitly&amp;lt;u&amp;gt; forbids&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; you to &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;withold&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; yourselves from each other, &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;explicitly&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;! So any woman withholding herself from her husband is breaking the &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;law&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; of &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;love&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; and the laws of the New Testament, I Corinthians 7th Chapter, verses 3-5.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       48. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;ALSO, IF A WIFE NOT ONLY DENIES HIM SEX BUT EVEN LEAVES HIM, THE SCRIPTURE CONSIDERS HER THE GUILTY PARTY!&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; If she&amp;#039;s &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;forsaken&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; him against his will, Paul says she&amp;#039;s still bound to her husband as long as she lives and she better not marry because she still belongs to him. (1Cor.7:10-11.) Now if he &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;gives&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; her away and sets her &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;free&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;, and she &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;want&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; to leave, &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;he&amp;#039;s&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; free and &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;she&amp;#039;s&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; free. This was even in the &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Mosaic&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; Law for that matter.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       49. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;JESUS WAS TRYING TO SHOW HOW THE LAW OF LOVE WAS EVEN MORE STRICT THAN THE MOSAIC LAW&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;!&amp;#039;&amp;#039; The &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Mosaic&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; Law allowed &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;divorce&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; and allowed a woman to remarry without being considered an adulteress. They didn&amp;#039;t even have to have the consent of the woman in those days, as long as the man just was no longer pleased with her, he could divorce her.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       50. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;(MARIA: SO IF THE WOMAN LEAVES, SHE&amp;#039;S STILL BOUND TO HER HUSBAND AND CAN&amp;#039;T MARRY, BUT WHAT ABOUT HIM?)&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; He&amp;#039;s &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;not&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; bound if she ran off and left &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;him&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; and he was &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;not&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; the guilty party. Paul himself says that the brother or sister is &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;not&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; bound in such a case. (1Cor.7:15.) He says &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;let&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; her depart!&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       51. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;ANY WOMAN WHO DENIES HERSELF TO HER HUSBAND HAS LEFT HIM!&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Even if they&amp;#039;re still sleeping in the same &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;bed&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; together, she has in &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;spirit&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; and in &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;body departed&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; from him! So it says &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;let&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; her depart, a brother or sister is &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;not&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; bound in &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;such&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; a case. The church has got this thing so screwed up for so many years it&amp;#039;s pitiful!&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       52. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; if simply because of her desire to save her home and hang on to her husband in &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;name only&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; and her meal ticket and her job and her children, that she &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;pretends openly&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; that she&amp;#039;s still his &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;wife&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;, whereas she is &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;denying&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; her husband in &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;bed&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; and is &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;refusing&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; him the privileges of a husband and is &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;refusing&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; to be a &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;wife&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; to him in &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;bed!&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       53. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;IF SHE&amp;#039;S REFUSING TO BE A WIFE TO HIM IN BED SHE IS NO WIFE&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;!&amp;#039;&amp;#039; She has left him in &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;spirit&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; and in &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;body&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; and has &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;departed&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;! And God&amp;#039;s Word says, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Let&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; her depart! A brother or sister is &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;not&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; bound in such a case!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       54. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;IF SHE DENIES HIM SEX PERSISTENTLY AND CONSISTENTLY&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; and continuously, not just because sometimes she&amp;#039;s tired or sometimes she&amp;#039;s sick or out of the mood or something, but she does it &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;all&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; the time because she&amp;lt;u&amp;gt; hates&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; him or she just doesn&amp;#039;t like him or doesn&amp;#039;t like &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;sex&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;, she is literally &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;departing&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; from her husband. (Maria: There&amp;#039;re a &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;lot&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; of women that do that!) Oh yes, there sure &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;are&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;!&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       55. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;THE CHURCH SOMETIMES ADVISES WOMEN TO DO IT JUST TO HOLD A CLUB OVER THEIR HUSBAND&amp;#039;S HEAD&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; and to try to control the husband through the women. That&amp;#039;s a common practice of the church, and let&amp;#039;s face it, &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;most&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; of the churches do the same in &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;spirit&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; and in &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;effect&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       56.&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;MARIA: WHAT IF THE WOMAN GOES OFF AND DOESN&amp;#039;T COME BACK AND THE HUSBAND WAITS A REASONABLE TIME?&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;)&amp;#039;&amp;#039; If &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;she&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; runs off, he doesn&amp;#039;t &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;have&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; to wait &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;any&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; time at &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;all&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;! He&amp;#039;s &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;free&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; from the moment she hits the door!&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       57. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;IF SHE COMES BACK A LITTLE LATER SAYING &amp;quot;I&amp;#039;M SORRY, TAKE ME BACK IN&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;,&amp;quot;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; the best he can do is say, &amp;quot;Well, I&amp;#039;m sorry too, dear. Since you say you&amp;#039;re sorry and you repent and you want to come home, I&amp;#039;ll have to take you back in because the Bible says to. I&amp;#039;ll forgive you and take you back in love.&amp;quot; (Mt.6:15; 18:21-22.)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       58.&amp;#039;&amp;#039; &amp;quot;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;BUT YOU&amp;#039;LL ALSO HAVE TO SLEEP WITH ANOTHER WOMAN ON THE OTHER SIDE OF ME&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; because I&amp;#039;ve already found somebody else!&amp;quot;--And there&amp;#039;s nothing she can do about it--at least not according to the laws of &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;God&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;, but maybe according to the laws of &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;man!&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       59. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;MAN&amp;#039;S LAWS ARE BASED ON CHURCH LAWS&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;,&amp;#039;&amp;#039; which as Jesus said, &amp;quot;Ye do by your &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;traditions&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; make of &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;none effect&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; the law of &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;God&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;!&amp;quot; (Mt.15:6) And that&amp;#039;s exactly what some &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;church&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; laws do and some &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;men&amp;#039;s&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; laws do--they make of &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;none effect&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; the law of &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;God&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; the law of &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;love!&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       60. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;IN MANY WAYS THE LAW OF LOVE IS EVEN MORE STRICT THAN THE MOSAIC LAW&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;.&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Under the &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Mosaic&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; Law you could divorce, put your wife away, although God said He hated it. Well, &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;now&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; He won&amp;#039;t tolerate it anymore unless she&amp;#039;s &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;guilty&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       61. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;JESUS SAID YOU&amp;#039;RE COMMITTING A GREAT SIN IF YOU PUT AWAY YOUR WIFE OR DIVORCE HER EXCEPT FOR THE CAUSE OF FORNICATION&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;.&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (Mt.5:32)--In other words, unless she&amp;#039;s been &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;unfaithful&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; to you--&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;then&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; you&amp;#039;re justified in getting rid of her if you want to. On the &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;other&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; hand, &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;another&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; thing He says &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;countermands&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; it:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       62. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;IF SHE&amp;#039;S SORRY AND SHE COMES BACK BEGGING FOR FORGIVENESS, HE SAYS YOU MUST FORGIVE HER.&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Now which are you going to do? The one supersedes the other. &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Love&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; in &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;both&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; cases supersedes the law. Do you understand? &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Love&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; supersedes the &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;law&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; in &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;all&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; cases.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       63. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;IN OTHER WORDS, IF YOUR WIFE COMMITS ADULTERY OR FORNICATION&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; or is unfaithful to you in some way, Jesus as good as said you have a &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;right&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; to divorce her. &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;But&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; on the &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;other&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; hand He said, &amp;quot;It&amp;#039;s &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;better&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; to forgive.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;And if you &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;don&amp;#039;t&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; forgive &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;other&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; people &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;their&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; sins, your Father in Heaven is &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;not&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; going to forgive &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;you&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; for &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;your&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; sin!&amp;quot; (Mt.6:14,15.)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       64. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;IF YOU&amp;#039;RE GOING TO BE SO DAMN SELF-RIGHTEOUS AND HOLIER THAN-THOU&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; and hypocritical as to think you&amp;#039;re holier than your &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;wife&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; because she has sinned against &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;you&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;, but oh, no, &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;you&amp;#039;re&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; the biggest sinner of &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;all&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;! Because &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;self-righteousness&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; is one of the greatest sins of all!&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       65. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;THEREFORE THE LAW OF LOVE SUPERSEDES THE LAW OF JUSTICE&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;The law of &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;justice&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; says you can &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;divorce&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; her if she has been disloyal and unfaithful to you, and for a lot of reasons. But the law of &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;love&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; says if she&amp;#039;s &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;sorry&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; you should &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;forgive&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; her and take her back in and &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;love&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; her. How do you know but maybe you&amp;#039;re going to &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;win&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; her, you might even win her!&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       66.&amp;#039;&amp;#039; &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;(MARIA: THAT &amp;quot;UNFAITHFUL&amp;quot; MEANS WHEN SHE&amp;#039;S DONE IT TO HURT HIM?&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;)-&amp;#039;&amp;#039;-Or in &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;selfishness&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; or just plain sinful &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;lust&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; or whatever! If she&amp;#039;s done it in such a way that it was against his consent or &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;without&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; his consent and against his will, and therefore it &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;hurt&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; him, then it&amp;#039;s &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;wrong&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       67. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;IF ALL PARTIES CONCERNED ARE NOT AGREED AND CONSENTING, THEN IT&amp;#039;S WRONG&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;.&amp;#039;&amp;#039; If any party &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;disagrees&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; but they are a &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;guilty&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; party themselves who are part of the &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;cause&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;, then that&amp;#039;s a different story. See, it&amp;#039;s a very complicated thing when you get into declaring who&amp;#039;s &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;guilty&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; and who &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;isn&amp;#039;t&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;, who&amp;#039;s &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;innocent.&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       68. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;THAT&amp;#039;S WHY YOU JUST HAVE TO GO ENTIRELY PURELY BY LOVE,&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; and by doing it in &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;love&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;, and because I &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;love&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; someone and they need &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;love&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;. You say, &amp;quot;Well, maybe it&amp;#039;s hurting the &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;wife&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;.&amp;quot; Maybe she &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;deserves&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; to be hurt, maybe she &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;needs&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; it, maybe she&amp;#039;s denied him! Why &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;else&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; unless his &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;wife&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; is &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;not&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; giving him the kind of love he needs?&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       69. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;IF SHE DENIES HIM SEX, SHE IS DEPARTING FROM HER HUSBAND&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; and it&amp;#039;s strictly against the laws of not only the &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Old&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; Testament but the &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;New&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; Testament. So therefore God&amp;#039;s Word says, &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;he&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; is &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;not&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; bound in such occasion. Not bound for what? He&amp;#039;s not bound to &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;her&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; anymore. Meaning what? He&amp;#039;s &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;free&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;! Free for what? To find somebody &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;else&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; if he wants to, who&amp;#039;ll give him what he needs, right?&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       70.&amp;#039;&amp;#039; &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;THAT&amp;#039;S LOVE, THAT&amp;#039;S GOD&amp;#039;S LAW OF LOVE&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;.&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Any woman who &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;withholds&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; herself from her husband does &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;not&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; love her husband, so if he doesn&amp;#039;t get love from his &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;wife&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; he is &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;free&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; to find it somewhere &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;else&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; according to &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;God&amp;#039;s&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; Law of &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Love&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;, and that&amp;#039;s the &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;truth&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;! That&amp;#039;s &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;God&amp;#039;s Word&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; and that&amp;#039;s &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;it&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;!&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       71.&amp;#039;&amp;#039; &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;GOD NOW ONLY JUDGES US ACCORDING TO WHETHER WE HAVE LOVE OR NO LOVE&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;--whether we have &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;love&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; or hate--whether what we do is done for &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;love&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; or selfishness and lack of love. And the one who had &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;love&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; and acted in &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;love&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; is the &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;innocent&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; party. And the one who acted &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;without&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; love and because he had &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;no&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; love is the &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;guilty&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; party--he &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;or&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; she!&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       72.&amp;#039;&amp;#039; &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;IF YOU KNOW YOU&amp;#039;RE ACTING IN LOVE, THEN YOU CAN GO AHEAD BY FAITH ACCORDING TO GOD&amp;#039;S WORD&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; and you don&amp;#039;t need anything else. You don&amp;#039;t need any other laws to go by, you don&amp;#039;t need any other laws to confirm it. You&amp;#039;re not guilty of disobeying &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;God&amp;#039;s&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; laws as long as whatever you&amp;#039;re doing you&amp;#039;re doing in &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;love&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       73.&amp;#039;&amp;#039; &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;OF COURSE YOU BETTER WATCH OUT FOR MAN AND HIS LAWS&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;,&amp;#039;&amp;#039; and sometimes women and &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;wives&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; who are still operating under &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;man&amp;#039;s&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; laws and &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;church&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; laws and &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;traditions&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; which &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;deny&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; the law of God and make &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;God&amp;#039;s&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; laws of none effect. You better watch out for &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;those&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; people, because they might get you under the laws of the &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;government&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; and the government carries the &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;guns&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; and they just might give you some &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;trouble&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;!&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       74. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;MAN&amp;#039;S LAWS DON&amp;#039;T ALWAYS JIVE WITH GOD&amp;#039;S LAWS, ESPECIALLY HIS LAW OF LOVE&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;.&amp;#039;&amp;#039; So you better watch your step if you&amp;#039;re offending the government or the church or your wife or your husband! We cannot please &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;everybody&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;, we can&amp;#039;t always please the &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;government&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;, certainly not the &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;church&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;, and very often not even our &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;husbands&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;wives&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;!--So &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;LOVE&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;!&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;       &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Copyright (c) 1998 by The Family&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:HomeARC]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Bot</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>