Natural law - Revision history

Panglossolalia at 21:35, 10 June 2006

2006-06-10T21:35:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:35, 10 June 2006
Line 11:		Line 11:

	[[Category:Beliefs]]		[[Category:Beliefs]]
			[[Category:Glossary]]

Thorwald: +Cat

2005-04-14T19:01:43Z

+Cat

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:01, 14 April 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
	''The naturalistic fallacy'' -- an appeal to "natural law" -- was a common fallacy employed in [[David Berg]]'s doctrines.		'''The naturalistic fallacy''' — an appeal to "natural law" — was a common fallacy employed in [[David Berg]]'s doctrines.

	This fallacy falls under the more inclusive set of fallacies known as ''argumentum ad antiquitam'', or, in English, an "appeal to tradition" and was commonly employed by Berg and [[The Family]] to characterize sexual impropriety as "natural" on the basis of average ages for puberal developments (i.e. that sexual development often commences prior to the [[age of consent]]).		This fallacy falls under the more inclusive set of fallacies known as ''argumentum ad antiquitam'', or, in English, an "appeal to tradition" and was commonly employed by Berg and [[The Family]] to characterize sexual impropriety as "natural" on the basis of average ages for puberal developments (i.e. that sexual development often commences prior to the [[age of consent]]).

	The argument neglected to note the discrepancy between sexual maturation and psychological maturation, and was self-indulgent in ~~naively~~ believing that sating adults' urges to have sex with minors would not be harmful.		The argument neglected to note the discrepancy between sexual maturation and psychological maturation, and was self-indulgent in naïvely believing that sating adults' urges to have sex with minors would not be harmful.

	For more information on this logical fallacy see the link(s) below.		For more information on this logical fallacy see the link(s) below.
Line 9:		Line 9:
	==External Links==		==External Links==
	[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalistic_fallacy Naturalistic Fallacy at Wikipedia]		[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalistic_fallacy Naturalistic Fallacy at Wikipedia]

			[[Category:Beliefs]]

ThePedanticPrick: You don't appeal to a fallacy, an appeal IS a fallacy

2005-04-14T17:45:15Z

You don't appeal to a fallacy, an appeal IS a fallacy

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:45, 14 April 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
	"~~Natural~~ law" was ~~an appeal to~~ a common fallacy employed in [[David Berg]]'s doctrines~~; ''the naturalistic fallacy''~~.		''The naturalistic fallacy'' -- an appeal to "natural law" -- was a common fallacy employed in [[David Berg]]'s doctrines.

			This fallacy falls under the more inclusive set of fallacies known as ''argumentum ad antiquitam'', or, in English, an "appeal to tradition" and was commonly employed by Berg and [[The Family]] to characterize sexual impropriety as "natural" on the basis of average ages for puberal developments (i.e. that sexual development often commences prior to the [[age of consent]]).

	~~This fallacy falls under~~ the ~~more inclusive set of fallacies known as ''argumentum ad antiquitam''~~, ~~or in English an "appeal to tradition"~~ and was ~~commonly employed by Berg and [[The Family]] to characterize sexual impropriety as "natural" on the basis of average ages for puberal developments (i.e.~~ that ~~sexual development often commences prior~~ to ~~the [[age of consent]])~~.		The argument neglected to note the discrepancy between sexual maturation and psychological maturation, and was self-indulgent in naively believing that sating adults' urges to have sex with minors would not be harmful.

	The argument neglected to note the discrepancy between sexual maturation and psychological maturation and was self-indulgent in naively believing that sating adults' urges to have sex with minors would not be harmful.		For more information on this logical fallacy see the link(s) below.


	For more information on this logical fallacy see the ~~following~~ link(s).

	==External Links==		==External Links==
	[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalistic_fallacy Naturalistic Fallacy at Wikipedia]		[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalistic_fallacy Naturalistic Fallacy at Wikipedia]

Craven de Kere at 08:38, 14 April 2005

2005-04-14T08:38:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:38, 14 April 2005
Line 4:		Line 4:
	This fallacy falls under the more inclusive set of fallacies known as ''argumentum ad antiquitam'', or in English an "appeal to tradition" and was commonly employed by Berg and [[The Family]] to characterize sexual impropriety as "natural" on the basis of average ages for puberal developments (i.e. that sexual development often commences prior to the [[age of consent]]).		This fallacy falls under the more inclusive set of fallacies known as ''argumentum ad antiquitam'', or in English an "appeal to tradition" and was commonly employed by Berg and [[The Family]] to characterize sexual impropriety as "natural" on the basis of average ages for puberal developments (i.e. that sexual development often commences prior to the [[age of consent]]).

	The argument neglected to note the discrepancy between sexual maturation and psychological maturation and was self-indulgent in naively believing that sating adults urges to have sex with minors ~~was~~ not ~~going to~~ be harmful.		The argument neglected to note the discrepancy between sexual maturation and psychological maturation and was self-indulgent in naively believing that sating adults' urges to have sex with minors would not be harmful.

Craven de Kere: fast sloppy extention, needs peer review

2005-02-05T10:01:06Z

fast sloppy extention, needs peer review

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:01, 5 February 2005
Line 2:		Line 2:


	This fallacy falls under the more inclusive set of fallacies known as ''argumentum ad antiquitam'', or in English an "appeal to tradition".		This fallacy falls under the more inclusive set of fallacies known as ''argumentum ad antiquitam'', or in English an "appeal to tradition" and was commonly employed by Berg and [[The Family]] to characterize sexual impropriety as "natural" on the basis of average ages for puberal developments (i.e. that sexual development often commences prior to the [[age of consent]]).

			The argument neglected to note the discrepancy between sexual maturation and psychological maturation and was self-indulgent in naively believing that sating adults urges to have sex with minors was not going to be harmful.

Jack at 00:03, 3 February 2005

2005-02-03T00:03:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:03, 3 February 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
	"Natural law" was an appeal to a common fallacy employed in David Berg's doctrines; ''the naturalistic fallacy''.		"Natural law" was an appeal to a common fallacy employed in [[David Berg]]'s doctrines; ''the naturalistic fallacy''.

Jack: from G cache

2005-02-03T00:03:05Z

from G cache

New page

"Natural law" was an appeal to a common fallacy employed in David Berg's doctrines; ''the naturalistic fallacy''.

This fallacy falls under the more inclusive set of fallacies known as ''argumentum ad antiquitam'', or in English an "appeal to tradition".

For more information on this logical fallacy see the following link(s).

==External Links==
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalistic_fallacy Naturalistic Fallacy at Wikipedia]