Difference between revisions of "Talk:David Berg"
From XFamily - Children of God
m |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
*Should this be a category? There are many sub-topics, for example "Berg and Antisemitism"...--[[User:Craven de Kere|Craven de Kere]] 05:00, 5 Jul 2005 (CDT) | *Should this be a category? There are many sub-topics, for example "Berg and Antisemitism"...--[[User:Craven de Kere|Craven de Kere]] 05:00, 5 Jul 2005 (CDT) | ||
**If we do make a "David Berg" category, IMHO the content of this article should not be moved to it (i.e. as we've done with [[:Category:History]]), but rather categorized under it, as I think the title of this article should remain simply "David Berg". Would creating such a category be sufficiently beneficial, given that we already have a "Related articles" section for this page? --[[User:Monger|Monger]] 21:20, 5 Jul 2005 (CDT) | **If we do make a "David Berg" category, IMHO the content of this article should not be moved to it (i.e. as we've done with [[:Category:History]]), but rather categorized under it, as I think the title of this article should remain simply "David Berg". Would creating such a category be sufficiently beneficial, given that we already have a "Related articles" section for this page? --[[User:Monger|Monger]] 21:20, 5 Jul 2005 (CDT) | ||
| + | ***I agree, and think the category would be beneficial as it would automatically create 2-way links. --[[User:Craven de Kere|Craven de Kere]] 22:33, 5 Jul 2005 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 03:33, 6 July 2005
- Should this be a category? There are many sub-topics, for example "Berg and Antisemitism"...--Craven de Kere 05:00, 5 Jul 2005 (CDT)
- If we do make a "David Berg" category, IMHO the content of this article should not be moved to it (i.e. as we've done with Category:History), but rather categorized under it, as I think the title of this article should remain simply "David Berg". Would creating such a category be sufficiently beneficial, given that we already have a "Related articles" section for this page? --Monger 21:20, 5 Jul 2005 (CDT)
- I agree, and think the category would be beneficial as it would automatically create 2-way links. --Craven de Kere 22:33, 5 Jul 2005 (CDT)
- If we do make a "David Berg" category, IMHO the content of this article should not be moved to it (i.e. as we've done with Category:History), but rather categorized under it, as I think the title of this article should remain simply "David Berg". Would creating such a category be sufficiently beneficial, given that we already have a "Related articles" section for this page? --Monger 21:20, 5 Jul 2005 (CDT)
