Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Leaders"

From XFamily - Children of God
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 
*Should "[[SGA]]" be created, links should probably be added to this article. --[[User:Craven de Kere|Craven de Kere]] 02:23, 11 Mar 2005 (CST)
 
*Should "[[SGA]]" be created, links should probably be added to this article. --[[User:Craven de Kere|Craven de Kere]] 02:23, 11 Mar 2005 (CST)
 +
**"SGA" is the more commonly used term. In fact, we should at the very least have REDIRECTS to the more common acronyms (i.e. JJT, WS, CO, CRO, etc.) —[[User:Thorwald|Thorwald]] 22:16, 13 Mar 2005 (CST)
 +
 +
*The Leadership Structure of TFI is very confusing to outsiders (and even me). For that reason, I have created a concept "Leadership Structure" section under Category:Leaders. What does everyone think about this? We could even add a little diagram (i.e. Flow Chart) of the structure. I can do this, however, I am not sure how the leadership is currently structured. —[[User:Thorwald|Thorwald]] 22:16, 13 Mar 2005 (CST)

Revision as of 04:16, 14 March 2005

  • Should "SGA" be created, links should probably be added to this article. --Craven de Kere 02:23, 11 Mar 2005 (CST)
    • "SGA" is the more commonly used term. In fact, we should at the very least have REDIRECTS to the more common acronyms (i.e. JJT, WS, CO, CRO, etc.) —Thorwald 22:16, 13 Mar 2005 (CST)
  • The Leadership Structure of TFI is very confusing to outsiders (and even me). For that reason, I have created a concept "Leadership Structure" section under Category:Leaders. What does everyone think about this? We could even add a little diagram (i.e. Flow Chart) of the structure. I can do this, however, I am not sure how the leadership is currently structured. —Thorwald 22:16, 13 Mar 2005 (CST)