Difference between revisions of "Talk:Miriam Williams Boeri"
From XFamily - Children of God
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'm confused as to how the abstract of a conference is relevant here. Can we delete it, please? [[User:ThePedanticPrick|ThePedanticPrick]] 21:24, 16 Jun 2005 (CDT) | I'm confused as to how the abstract of a conference is relevant here. Can we delete it, please? [[User:ThePedanticPrick|ThePedanticPrick]] 21:24, 16 Jun 2005 (CDT) | ||
*Go right ahead. Her cult reaserch is definitely worth noting though. If the original author of the peice (or any other editors) object to removing the abstract they can make their case and put it back. --[[User:Monger|Monger]] 21:33, 16 Jun 2005 (CDT) | *Go right ahead. Her cult reaserch is definitely worth noting though. If the original author of the peice (or any other editors) object to removing the abstract they can make their case and put it back. --[[User:Monger|Monger]] 21:33, 16 Jun 2005 (CDT) | ||
| + | **Might vote is to delete the abstract. However, I would leave most of the other stuff. --[[User:Thorwald|Thorwald]] 21:39, 16 Jun 2005 (CDT) | ||
| + | *** My original idea was to highlight her NRM/cult related research. I agree the abstract quotes are somewhat long and out of place. I have replaced the abstracts with a sentence referring to her research. It could probably be worded better so feel free to make any changes. [[User:Peterf|Peter F.]] 21:53, 16 Jun 2005 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 02:53, 17 June 2005
I'm confused as to how the abstract of a conference is relevant here. Can we delete it, please? ThePedanticPrick 21:24, 16 Jun 2005 (CDT)
- Go right ahead. Her cult reaserch is definitely worth noting though. If the original author of the peice (or any other editors) object to removing the abstract they can make their case and put it back. --Monger 21:33, 16 Jun 2005 (CDT)
- Might vote is to delete the abstract. However, I would leave most of the other stuff. --Thorwald 21:39, 16 Jun 2005 (CDT)
- My original idea was to highlight her NRM/cult related research. I agree the abstract quotes are somewhat long and out of place. I have replaced the abstracts with a sentence referring to her research. It could probably be worded better so feel free to make any changes. Peter F. 21:53, 16 Jun 2005 (CDT)
- Might vote is to delete the abstract. However, I would leave most of the other stuff. --Thorwald 21:39, 16 Jun 2005 (CDT)
